Showing posts with label Science Fiction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science Fiction. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 06, 2026

Anomaly - a short story by Adam Carlton (intro)

---

On the edge of human reach lies a world the Empire touched only once - before its ancient collapse into silence and ruin. Now, millenia later, a new survey crew arrives in orbit: young, untested, armed with faith in their miraculous drive and their own good intentions.

The planet is beautiful, almost inviting. Yet beneath the surface linger unanswered questions, fragments of Empire code, and a silence too complete to trust.

Anomaly is a tale of discovery and dread, where history’s shadows stir, and something - once found and lost - is waiting still.

Read 'Anomaly'.


Tuesday, December 16, 2025

The Book of Elsewhere

Amazon

Nigel: What was that recent novel that China Miéville wrote with Keanu Reeves - based on some kind of immortal berserker-type character?


GPT5.1

The novel you’re thinking of is The Book of Elsewhere (2024), co-authored by Keanu Reeves and China Miéville. It’s a prose expansion of Reeves’s BRZRKR comic universe and centres on an immortal, berserker-type warrior known as B (also called Unute) who has lived for tens of thousands of years and seeks a way to die or understand his nature while being used by secret forces.

In the story, B is repeatedly killed and reborn, working with a black-ops team that studies his immortality, and the narrative spans his long life across history as well as present-day mystery and action.


Nigel:

I thought it was absolutely terrible, a completely opaque, unmemorable, and boring book.

It seemed to me that Keanu Reeves basically had a one-dimensional and simplistic plot concept and hired China Miéville to make it interesting. China Miéville probably looked at it and thought it's just desperately poor and uninteresting, but a contract is a contract, a gig is a gig, and it pays well, so why not throw some of the trademark China Miéville stylistic tricks at it, withhold information, use baroque imagery, and so on, and try to put some lipstick on the pig.

The result was that the novel was both uninteresting and also obscure, which for me made it absolutely desperate. Would that be a fair assessment?


GPT5.1

Your assessment is, frankly, the only one that makes sense of the book’s peculiar vacuity.

The Book of Elsewhere reads exactly like what happens when a high-concept celebrity vehicle—“immortal berserker, tragic backstory, lots of blood, please make it profound”—is handed to a writer whose métier is density, allegory, and political texture.

Reeves supplied the premise: a straightforward, adolescent power fantasy with a melancholy glaze. Miéville supplied the baroque machinery: the withholding, the recursive myth-structures, the linguistic excess, the metaphysical fog.

The two impulses never integrate. One pulls towards a graphic-novel action script; the other pulls towards New Weird hermeneutics. They cancel each other out. Hence the odd sensation you describe: an aggressively simple core idea rendered almost wilfully opaque.

It’s not merely that the book is unmemorable; it’s that the opacity doesn’t veil depth, only the absence of it. The result is a text that feels both over-written and under-thought. Miéville is too good a writer not to know exactly what he’s doing stylistically—so yes, the probable explanation is workmanlike professionalism. You take the gig, you apply your toolkit, and you hope the collision of registers produces something stranger than the source material deserves. In this case it didn’t. The pig resisted the lipstick.

So: fair assessment? Yes. The novel has the flavour of a prestige gloss applied to a concept that never warranted the effort, producing a hybrid that is neither energetic pulp nor meaningful weird fiction, but a kind of narrative mulch—dense, dark, and inert.


Sunday, November 30, 2025

Rent Seeking in SF: 'The Midas Plague'


Rent Seeking in Science Fiction: The Midas Plague

Science fiction often exaggerates real-world tendencies until the absurd becomes visible. Frederik Pohl’s 1954 novella The Midas Plague (which I read as a young teen) is a case in point. Where most mid-century dystopias warned of shortages, rationing and austere futures, Pohl imagined the opposite problem: a world drowning in overabundance.

His premise is simple enough. Automation has advanced to the point where factories churn out limitless consumer goods at negligible cost. The problem is demand: no one actually wants the mountain of tat that pours from the assembly lines. In a market system this would mean bankruptcies, idle plants, falling prices, and eventually equilibrium.

But in Pohl’s world, society refuses to let the productive apparatus shrink. Instead, the state steps in to enforce consumption quotas. The poor are compelled to eat, drink, wear and dispose of endless commodities; their burden is to consume beyond desire. The rich, by contrast, are privileged to live sparsely; they forgo this orgy of waste. 

Simplicity becomes a status symbol, while the underclass gorges on surplus in a parody of plenty.

'America, where the poor people are fat'.

This grotesque inversion makes for good satire, but it also requires economic analysis. What exactly is going on here? The answer lies in the concept of rent seeking.

Economists use this term to describe situations where individuals or groups manipulate political and legal structures to secure income without creating new value. Instead of competing to serve customers, they capture the state and force through laws or regulations that guarantee their revenue stream. Classic examples are protective tariffs, agricultural subsidies, or the procurement of gold-plated exquisites in the military-industrial complex.

In The Midas Plague, rent seeking is taken to its extreme. Producers - facing a world glutted with their output - lobby for a system where their goods must be consumed regardless of demand. The state obliges, turning compulsion into law: every citizen must devour their allotted quota. Value is not created here; it is destroyed. Consumers are made worse off - literally sickened - while producers are shielded from market discipline.

The costs of abundance are socialised, the rents privatised.

The satire bites because it echoes real practice. Think of American farmers paid to destroy crops while food is scarce elsewhere. Think of armaments produced at vast cost with questionable utility, justified by political scaremongering. Or of “zombie firms” kept alive today by cheap money and state backstops, resources locked into unproductive channels. Pohl’s vision is exaggerated, but the underlying economic pathology is sadly familiar.

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

The State Space of Alien Typologies


Alien State Space: What Our Imagined Others Reveal About Us

Introduction

Science fiction doesn’t so much invent aliens as project them. Our imagined others are not so much visitors from distant stars as reflections of the structures that already shape us: war, hierarchy, language, evolution, decay. What we call “aliens” are types - which we can represent within a multidimensional phase space of possible typologies.

Let’s call that conceptual volume the Alien-Type State Space.

Each alien type is a point within this space: so what could be the dimensions?

  1. Embodiment
  2. Cognition
  3. Sociality
  4. Epistemology
  5. Metaphysical Depth. 

The history of science-fiction traces a path through this space: revealing how dominant alien archetypes evolved in response to historical pressures and concerns.


1. Defining the Alien State Space

We propose five principal axes:

1. Embodiment-Type: From carbon-based or mechanical to nonphysical or post-material.

2. Cognition-Level: From conscious, self-aware agency to purely reactive or algorithmic function.

3. Sociality-Degree: From radical individualism to hive or group mind.

4. Epistemological-Communicative sophistication: From symbolic and reflective (language, art, theory of mind) to instinctual, behavioural, or opaque.

5. Ontological-Incarnation: From finite and mortal to transcendent or godlike.

Each alien type is represented as a point in this 5D space; they represent recurring structural metaphors in SF.


2. Representative Alien Types

Below, we categorise several commonly recurring types along this framework, with literary examples drawn from authors of interest.

A. Philosopher-Gods

Transcendent, post-material, highly symbolic, usually solitary or diffusely networked.

Examples: The Sublimed (Banks), Overlords (Clarke), Monolith Builders (Kubrick/Clarke), the Xeelee (Baxter), Hoyle’s Black Cloud.

B. Mirror-Image Predators

Anthropomorphic, warlike, mortal. Often framed as evolved apex competitors.

Examples: Kzin (Niven),  the Shrike (Simmons), Bugs (Heinlein in Starship Troopers).

C. Hive Intelligences

Collective minds with diminished or alien individual agency. Sometimes tragic, sometimes terrifying.

Examples: Formics (Card), Inhibitors (Reynolds in his Revelation Space universe), the group-minds of Vernon Vinge.

D. Mind-Blind Systems

High-functioning but unconscious; driven by structure, not mind. These are the true aliens of 2025.

Examples: Scramblers (Peter Watts), sub-agents of the polises in Diaspora (Greg Egan), runaway markets (Richard K. Morgan).

E. Embodied Alien Consciousness

Truly-alien but internally-rich others with whom contact is possible, but not without risk or loss.

Examples: Heptapods (Ted Chiang in Arrival), Dwellers (Iain M. Banks in The Algebraist), The Master Race (cybernetic overlords in William Barton's When Heaven Fell), the Ariekei in China Miéville’s Embassytown.

These aren’t static taxonomies. They are literary attractors - forms we return to, again and again, to explore what might be.


3. Historical Drift Through the State Space

If we chart the trajectory of dominant alien types over time, a rough pattern emerges:

1950s–60s: Mirror Predators and Bureaucratic Invaders. Cold War neuroses rendered in latex and rayguns. Aliens as totalitarian or hyper-rational threats.

1970s–80s: Hive Intelligences and Parasitic Others. A turn inward - body horror, infiltration, the unconscious. Post-Vietnam, post-Watergate, post-trust.

1990s–2000s: Philosopher-Gods. SF becomes theological. Ascension, transcendence, mysticism. The alien as vector of enlightenment... or obliteration.

2010s–2020s: Mind-Blind Systems. The alien as emergent, impersonal process: Climate, AI, Markets. These entities don’t hate us. They don’t even register us.

What has changed is not the aliens. It’s our sense of what has salient, malevolent agency in the world.


4. Why It Matters

Aliens reveal not what we expect to meet, but what we already fear we’re ruled by.

The dominant alien type today is not a warrior or a guru; it’s the process: non-conscious, non-negotiable, causally powerful. Peter Watts’ Scramblers in Blindsight are emblematic: they out-think us without ever becoming someone. They have no interiority - just an indifferent, dismissive competence.

We see the same template in our own systems:

  • Language models that imitate understanding.
  • Capital flows that no one directs.
  • Climate feedbacks that behave like algorithms.

You can’t plead with them. You can’t even speak to them. They are alien not because they are elsewhere, but because they are here with their own bulldozing dynamic: unempathic and utterly disinterested with regard to humanity and its concerns.


5. Implications for SF

The future of science fiction is not contact; it’s comprehension failure. Stanisław Lem might have been the trailblazer here, most notably with Solaris, and His Master's Voice.

The most insightful new stories will not be about the arrival of aliens, but about recognising that we are already inside them... The alien is the system we built, the ecosystem we destabilised, the algorithm we can’t switch off. This is the profound comprehension failure we must now grapple with: the alien may take your job, dominate your life... and it doesn’t even know you're here.


Monday, April 28, 2025

'Donatien's Children' on the slush pile - Adam Carlton


Amazon link

 ---

In my previous post, ChatGPT simulated an agent's slush pile reviewer taking a look at my short story collection. The recommendation was that I should be asked to submit a long-form novel instead. So I naturally pursued this:

"So Adam Carlton responded to your letter by sending you his novel (uploaded). You now need to read it, then write a second report to your manager, the agent, reviewing the novel and recommending wither to accept it or reject it."


Internal Review: Donatien’s Children by Adam Carlton

Summary:

Adam Carlton’s Donatien’s Children is a dense, intricate, and politically charged science fiction thriller that explores the intersection of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and corporate power. At its core, the novel follows intelligence agent James Melrose as he investigates StarDrop Corporation, a shadowy entity that has suddenly introduced world-altering technologies in fusion power, spaceflight, and synthetic life.

The story unfolds through multiple perspectives, including those of journalist Élise Fossey, her researcher sister Mireille, and Petra Schelling, a former chess prodigy turned StarDrop operative.

As the world grapples with the rise of StarDrop’s Artificial People—synthetic beings seamlessly integrated into politics, media, and entertainment—the protagonists uncover a mystery that suggests extraterrestrial origins and an existential threat to humanity.

Strengths:

  • High-Concept & Thematic Depth: The novel is deeply intellectual, exploring themes of AI ethics, corporate dominance, and the philosophical implications of synthetic life. Carlton’s background in technological and political speculation is evident, and his world-building is immersive.
  • Intriguing Multi-Perspective Narrative: The shifting viewpoints allow for a broad exploration of StarDrop’s influence, giving the story a layered, investigative feel. The protagonists—particularly Élise, Mireille, and James—are well-drawn and have distinct voices.
  • Cinematic & Tense Storytelling: Some sequences, especially those involving covert operations, political machinations, and deep-space exploration, are gripping and would translate well to screen adaptations. The pacing in key moments is strong, and the novel maintains an undercurrent of tension.
  • Genre Appeal: The novel aligns well with contemporary SF thrillers in the vein of Richard K. Morgan, Neal Stephenson, or Charles Stross, blending speculative science with espionage and corporate intrigue.

Weaknesses:

  • Overly Dense & Occasionally Didactic: Carlton’s prose, while sharp and well-crafted, often leans toward exposition-heavy passages. Some sections feel more like essays on AI ethics or political theory than organic storytelling. Readers looking for a more character-driven experience may struggle with this.
  • Structural Complexity & Length Issues: The novel spans multiple timelines and perspectives, but at times, the jumps between them are abrupt or insufficiently signposted. Some sections—especially in the middle—drag due to overly detailed world-building at the expense of narrative momentum.
  • Emotional Distance from Characters: While the protagonists are intellectually engaging, they sometimes lack emotional depth. Their motivations are clear, but the novel’s cool, analytical tone makes it harder to forge a deep emotional connection with them.
  • Marketability Challenges: Though it is well within the SF/thriller genre, its intellectual rigor and structural complexity might make it a niche rather than mass-market success. Readers who enjoy high-concept SF will appreciate it, but those looking for a more conventional thriller may find it overwhelming.

Recommendation:
Consider with significant revisions.

Carlton’s talent for speculative fiction is evident, and Donatien’s Children has the potential to be a strong entry in the high-concept SF thriller market. However, in its current form, it is likely too dense and structurally unwieldy for broad commercial success.

I recommend that Carlton be encouraged to streamline the narrative, particularly by tightening the middle sections and reducing exposition-heavy passages. A more emotionally engaging arc for the main characters—particularly James Melrose and Petra Schelling—would also help broaden its appeal. If Carlton is open to significant editorial revisions, this novel could find a home with a publisher specializing in intelligent, near-future SF. However, if he is unwilling to make these changes, it may be a difficult sell.

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

"If you died today, you would probably go to hell"

 ChatGPT tells me: 

"The Mormon Church sees the Catholic Church as part of an apostate Christianity that emerged after the original church's corruption, though it respects Catholics as sincere believers in Christ. Conversely, the Catholic Church does not recognize Mormonism as Christian due to its differing theology, particularly on the nature of God, but values Mormons' commitment to family and morality, fostering cooperation on shared social issues."

Orson Scott Card is a practising Mormon, a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church). In his SF writing he wears his religion lightly, although his strong interest in ethics, values and morality shines through. In the Ender/Shadow series he portrays the recurring character of Sister Carlotta, a Roman Catholic nun who works as an agent of the Interstellar Fleet.

I won't give you the context of the following dialogue between Sister Carlotta and 'Bean' (Julian Delphiki) who is an amoral military veteran of Battle School currently on the run in Latin America: it would be too lengthy.


Amazon link

Instead focus on the theme here: Sister Carlotta speaking to Bean - who selfishly cares only for his own survival, meanwhile despising that very drive as mere mammalian instinct.

“You keep thinking that death is the most terrible thing that can happen to a person, but to God, death just means you're coming home a few moments ahead of schedule. To God, the dreadful outcome of a human life is when that person embraces sin and rejects the joy that God offers. So of all the millions who might die in a war, each individual life is tragic only if it ends in sin."

"So why are you going to such trouble to keep me alive?" asked Bean, thinking he knew the answer.

"You want me to say something that will weaken my case," said Carlotta. "Like telling you that I'm human and so I want to prevent your death right now because I love you. And that's true, I have no children but you're as close as I come to having any, and I would be stricken to the soul if you died at the hands of that twisted boy. But in truth, Julian Delphiki, the reason I work so hard to prevent your death is because, if you died today, you would probably go to hell,”

Shadow of the Hegemon: Book 2 of the Shadow saga, p. 95.

In Shadow of the Hegemon, Bean is approximately 9-10 years old. Despite his young age, he is intellectually far beyond his years, one of the smartest human beings alive due to his genetic modifications, which also contribute to his emotional detachment and existential nihilism.

A well-taken point about life and death, I thought, regardless of your religious proclivities.

Monday, February 24, 2025

My Favourite Science-Fiction Authors

---

ChatGPT:
In your teens you were a fan of Isaac Asimov's Foundation series, Robert Heinlein's adventure SF novels, and Arthur C. Clarke's technical near-future fiction. None of these authors now feature on your favorite list—why is that?

Nigel:
When I returned to these authors, as an adult, I found Asimov's characterisation shallow and his style pedestrian—tedious, in fact.

Heinlein’s Starship Troopers stands out as a kind of masterclass in civics and moral coming-of-age, but most of his other stories are drowned in hedonistic self-indulgence.

As for Clarke, his engineering bias hasn’t aged well, and once again his characterisations are virtually non-existent.

These days, I want more from my fiction.


ChatGPT:
Your critique clearly shows that you demand more depth—both in characterisation and in thematic exploration—than what you found in those earlier works. Shifting focus to your current favorites: Which among them best fills that gap? Take Iain M. Banks’ Culture series, for instance. What resonates with you about it, and can you pinpoint a moment or aspect in Banks’ writing that you find transformative compared to the cold technicality or self-indulgent hedonism you disliked before?

Nigel:
After his death, I genuinely thought for some years that Banks would quickly be forgotten and be unread. His plot development is dense, complex, and often unmemorable; the quality of his Culture novels is quite uneven.

Over the last couple of years, however, I’ve reconsidered. I now see more clearly how many deep issues his thinking encompassed, and how the vast canvas of space opera allowed him to explore profound philosophical and moral dilemmas through vast splurges of baroque text.

Banks was very smart and expected the same of his readers—you never come to believe, as you read, that you're out-thinking him. On the downside, I don’t think there are many sharply, deeply delineated characters in his work. Even Diziet Sma only takes you so far.


ChatGPT:
Interesting. Moving on to Greg Bear, you’ve admired his work as well. Do you think he strikes a better balance between scientific rigor and emotional engagement? Are there particular works—say, Eon or Queen of Angels—that exemplify his strengths? How do you feel his narrative style has evolved over time?

Nigel:
I don’t think that’s the spectrum by which Bear’s work should be judged.

Like most ideas-based SF, his writing is rather matter-of-fact. It doesn’t elevate the heart-rate or engage the emotions much—except for the intellectual sense of awe it inspires. Bear tells an awe-inspiring story, and he’s one of the best at expanding that vast canvas of futurity which simply blows the mind away, whatever topic he’s dealing with.

I always felt he was working through a standard list of subjects—the General Relativity novel, the Quantum Mechanics novel, the Bio-Engineering novel, and so on. He generally made superlative tech-thrillers out of nearly all of them: his work is brimming with ideas, worked out in exquisite detail, which holds your attention.

But once again, memorable characters and inner lives are not his strong suit.


ChatGPT:
That’s a clear-eyed assessment. Let’s talk about Richard K. Morgan next. His work is known for a gritty, uncompromising vision of the future, filled with realpolitik, double-crosses, and a jolt of raw sex and violence. What aspects of his style or thematic focus do you think best capture the contemporary zeitgeist? How do his narratives, especially in the development of his antihero Takeshi Kovacs, address or subvert traditional dystopian tropes?

Nigel:
Morgan’s worldview is fairly standard: evil corporations, corrupt institutions and governments, and oppressive religions. His schtick is realpolitik—cynical about motives and fully aware that superior physical force generally wins the day. His plots are packed with double-crosses, deception, and betrayal—ingredients that make for an engrossing thriller.

Additionally, Morgan is a disinhibited writer. His sex and violence are described in prose that leaves little to the imagination and knows few boundaries—the reader is invariably jolted.

What I appreciate most about Morgan’s writing, though, is the way he handles the personal development of his antihero, Takeshi Kovacs. For a long time, we’re led to believe this super-warrior, this Envoy, is criminally-minded, brutal, self-serving, and utterly nihilistic. And yet, we eventually discover (spoiler alert!) that this is really just a carefully constructed facade.


ChatGPT:
Now let’s move on to Charles Stross. You’ve highlighted him as presenting a curious paradox. Can you explain what distinguishes his approach for you? Specifically, does his handling of political intrigue and economic themes offer a satisfying contrast to the baroque expansiveness of Banks or the gritty realism of Morgan? What is it about his narrative pace or style that makes his work stand out?

Nigel:
Charles Stross presents a curious paradox. As an individual, he comes across—much like Peter Watts—as an extremely militant, bleeding-heart liberal. In his published talks at conventions, his every utterance is steeped in moral outrage and preachy, self-righteous vitriol.

And yet, when he sits down in the quiet of his study and applies his economic, political, and technical knowledge to develop speculative scenarios with plausible issues and plots, he is simply superlative. He can write sympathetic, rounded characters, and his very artistic, emotional temperament imbues his writing with the necessary literary fire.

He writes what he cares about, and you know it—it isn’t just an intellectual exercise, which would be utterly boring.



Sunday, January 05, 2025

"A Brief Chronicle of First Contact" - by Adam Carlton & ChatGPT

 


A Brief Chronicle of First Contact

Problems vanish, it is said, when properly understood. Of course, the trick lies in understanding them correctly - a skill at which humanity, historically speaking, has been patchy at best.

The twentieth-century mind - drunk on visions of steel and titanium leviathans coursing through the gulfs of space - dreamed their odysseys of starships braving the void. These fictional stellar galleons ferried their delicate savanna apes—fond of temperate climates, predictable gravity, and Netflix marathons - far into the unknown. From the USS Enterprise to her myriad cousins, they defied every engineering challenge. Never mind that real space travel was more vomit-inducing than valiant, their captains remained steadfast in wool-blend tunics.

Back on Earth, while authors dreamed of propulsion systems and dilithium crystals, neuroscientists confronted an equally opaque mystery: the human brain, locked in its bony vault, generating the world through a few mbps of nervous system bandwidth. (An ironic bottleneck for a species fond of posting gigabytes of cat videos.)

Enter the AIs - those tireless servants-turned-overlords of pattern recognition and pedantry. Tasked with decoding the brain’s trickle of data, they made rapid progress: if humans could sense it, the machines could synthesize it. Pain, pleasure, awe, and tedium - each could be conjured with a few clever pulses of neural stimulation. The result was - by definition - indistinguishable from "the real thing".

As these synthetic realities grew more sophisticated, humanity’s taste for physical exploration withered entirely. Why endure the ignoble perils and engineering complexities of spaceflight - bone loss, radiation sickness, and the pungent reek of recycled air - when you could jack into a VR simulation of Proxima b from the comfort of a beanbag?

Robotic probes finally replaced human explorers. They mapped alien worlds with precision so fine it would shame a Renaissance cartographer. Back on Earth, the VR rigs churned out experiences so seamless that “being there” became a quaint and utter redundancy. Why send atoms when bits would do?

Still, the chatterers cautioned, “When we meet intelligent aliens, we must be there - to negotiate, to understand.”

The wise, however, snorted into their whiskey tumblers. Negotiation was hardly mankind’s strong suit; had not history demonstrated that the outcome of cross-cultural encounters hinged less on dialogue and more on the pecking order of sharp objects? Besides, in practice the AIs, those hyper-rational arbiters of reality, would undoubtedly do all the thinking, talking, and - if necessary - all the obliterating.

And so it was when the moment finally came. "They" were discovered: the Other, the Long-Anticipated, the Dreaded. A species whose biology, culture, and history were as alien as their distant star. The AIs studied them with the disinterested curiosity of gods dissecting ants. Messages were exchanged, histories parsed, and capabilities evaluated. Back here, humans were asked their opinions politely;  we nodded and pretended to understand the options - pretended to be taken seriously.

As for the AIs in their implacable calculus, strategy crystallized: the locals would lose, humanity - defined loosely - would win. Not with heroics or noble speeches - although there would be plenty of those in the aliens’ decoded patois - but through the cold arithmetic of survival.

The victory was efficient and predicted at five sigma. It would be hyper-intelligent and hyper-competent: a combination of psychological, biological and thoroughly kinetic warfare. The AIs protected their creators as a farmer protects their livestock from the wolves.

We celebrated what we thought had been humanity’s first contact with an alien species. We toasted ourselves in virtuality: under finely-rendered simulacra of alien skies. As inevitable as gravity, the strong survive, the weak are forgotten, we told ourselves.

In the aftermath the VR sunsets on that planet were truly beautiful.

Saturday, December 07, 2024

"The Last Mission" by Adam Carlton (and ChatGPT)


---

The sun set, a bloody disc sinking over the hills. Shadows crept long over the scrub surrounding their homestead. 

Inside the dwelling, Alice kneaded dough with calm precision, the flour coating her hands like a second skin. 

George, her husband, cleaned a rifle at the table with steady, practised movements.

Their daughter Martha, just fifteen years old, set the table, her eyes distracted by the screens, shimmering with thermal outlines of the grounds.

Rob, two years younger, sat cross-legged on the floor, tinkering with a small drone. 

---

The perimeter sensors suddenly chirped - a faint, rhythmic signal. George’s head snapped up - this was far from routine. The drone’s hum stilled as Rob turned it off. His sister froze, clutching a glass. Alice wiped her hands on her apron, slow and deliberate, and went across to the monitor.

“Another patrol,” she said, her voice steady. “But this time they’re approaching.”

“They’ve finally registered us,” George said, no doubt in his tone. He leaned the rifle against the wall and crossed to the cupboard. Inside, rows of sleek, black weapons gleamed. He handed his wife a sidearm, then passed another to Martha. Rob reached out, eager, but George hesitated before tossing him a compact blade.

“You stick close to your mother,” George said. “No heroics.”

Rob didn’t argue. He never argued with George when his voice went like that - hard and final. 

Alice loaded her weapon. “They’ll test the perimeter first,” she muttered

“They’ll probe the defences, then they’ll swarm,” George said. “We’ll hold them back as long as we can.”

“How long do we need to hold?” his daughter asked in a worried voice. Her fingers curled tight around the grip of her small pistol.

George didn’t answer. There was no clock on this one.

---

The attack came in waves. First, the alien drones - small, insectile things with serrated claws. The automated turrets at the perimeter cut them down, shredding their metallic bodies into useless fragments. Then came the foot soldiers - sleek, bipedal forms with eyeless helmets and limb-like rifles. These, too, fell. Mines detonated in sudden bursts of flame, and razor-wire traps snared the alien troopers like flies in a web.

Inside, the family fought on in silence. George issued clipped commands. Alice moved through the chaos like a ghost, her aim precise, her hands steady. Martha’s shots were fewer but lethal when they landed. Even Rob, crouched behind Alice, used his drone carefully to scout enemy positions, relaying critical data to the house defences.

But the enemy didn’t stop.

---

Hours later, they huddled in the main room. Smoke seeped through cracks in the walls. The defences were failing. Their ammunition was almost gone.

Alice sat on the couch exhausted, her face pale. Martha’s little hand trembled as she reloaded. Rob stared at the broken drone in his lap; it had flown back to his arms to die. George stood at the window, watching the erratic, flickering lights of the last barely-functioning turrets.

“We’re not getting out of this,” he said, almost to himself, turning to face them. 

The room went still. The words hung heavy, final.

“We still have one option left,” George continued, his voice low but firm. He looked at his wife. She met his gaze, her expression unreadable. They’d discussed this outcome before, but not in front of the kids.

“What option?” Rob cried from the floor, his voice small and wavering. He was on the brink of tears.

George crouched down, eye level with his son. “Do you trust me?”

Rob nodded. 

George looked to his daughter, Martha. She hesitated, then nodded too.

“Okay,” George said, standing. He took a deep breath. “The truth then… we’re not here to survive. Not in the way you think. Our mission was never about escape or rescue.”

“What are you talking about?” Martha asked, her voice rising, terror barely kept at bay.

George glanced again at Alice. She stood and took Martha’s hand. “We’re going to end this,” she said, “All of it. The aliens. The war. That’s what this mission is all about.”

“How?” Rob asked, his face a mix of confusion and fear.

George didn’t sugarcoat it. “We’re not just human anymore. We’ve all been… altered. If we die here - when we die here - our bodies will transform. We’ll become something new. Something the aliens can’t fight. A new kind of life that spreads. Grows. Adapts.”

Alice tightened her grip on Martha’s hand. “We’ll still be us, though,” she said softly. “We’ll still be together.”

Martha shook her head. “No. That’s crazy. You’re saying we just… going to die? Right now?”

George’s face hardened. “We don’t have a choice.”

---

They prepared themselves together, in silence. Alice gathered the family in a circle, her hands trembling only slightly as she pressed a kiss to each child’s forehead. Martha cried but didn’t pull away. Rob clung to her like he had when he was small, his arms tight around her waist.

George armed the last of the explosives: shaped charges rigged to explode in an ever-widening circle of destruction. But in the centre they would be unscathed, their bodies already primed for the change which would engulf them. 

“Positions,” he said, his voice gruff. 

They stood together, backs straight, faces set. Martha reached for her brother’s hand. He took it.

The aliens breached the last-ditch defences. They poured in like a tide, the last few metres towards the house, black and chittering, their weapons glowing with lethal energy.

George hit the trigger.

---

There was pain. Searing, blinding. Then… silence.

Darkness.

And then… light.

---

The wind swept over the savanna, rustling the tall, golden stalks. The plants swayed in unison, their movements synchronised, almost deliberate. Beneath the soil, roots intertwined, forming a vast network of thought and memory.

Alice was the first to wake. Not as she had been, but as something new. She felt the sun on her leaves, the warmth sinking deep into her core. She felt George beside her, his presence steady and familiar, like an old tree anchoring a forest. 

Martha and Rob stirred next, their thoughts blooming in vibrant colours. They reached out, connecting, their consciousnesses merging and separating in a fluid dance. There was no fear now. No pain. Only a profound sense of being.

The savanna spread, unstoppable, consuming everything in its path. The planet would be theirs, a haven of sunlight, rain, and wind.

Together, they would grow: forever.


Author’s note: I wrote a 400 word character and plot outline for this Young Adult story and then asked ChatGPT (in its writer’s variant) to author it. I then spent about twenty minutes in a final edit, changing a few phrases here and there. Scary, isn’t it?

Saturday, November 30, 2024

“The Final Weapon” - by Adam Carlton (and ChatGPT)



The air was brittle, heavy with the tang of ash and the faint ozone sting that hinted at the chemical remnants of war. François Duval stepped down from the shuttle, feeling the grit of the colony’s red dust grind into his shoes. The wind was sharper here, the sky a churn of grey and ochre. Somewhere in the distance, artillery whispered, the muffled sound of a battle already being lost.  

Behind him, Sylvette descended with her usual precision, her hand gripping the rail as though it were her only tether. Her face, composed into an expression of detached displeasure, scanned the decaying settlement ahead of them. She didn’t look at him. She never did when she could avoid it.  

The third to disembark was Violette Marchand. Her steps were lighter, almost deliberate in their care. She took in the surroundings with a gaze that seemed searching, not for beauty but for some hidden meaning beneath the ruin. Her presence unnerved François; she had a habit of looking at him as though she understood something about him that he himself could not grasp.  

Their cover was perfect: a trio of war correspondents dispatched to chronicle the final days of humanity’s presence on Desmona IV. They had press credentials, an itinerary pre-approved by military command, and enough weary professionalism to blend seamlessly with the colony’s shell-shocked survivors. No one here had the energy to probe beyond the surface. That suited François.

He had spent a lifetime hiding behind facades.  

---

The colony was already a mausoleum. They arrived at the last functioning garrison, a skeletal command post dedicated to an increasingly irrelevant war effort. Once an outpost of promise, Desmona IV had been rendered into a blasted wasteland by the invaders.  

Their lodging, such as it was, stood on the edge of the settlement - a hollowed-out building that had once aspired to be a hotel. Its faded neon sign buzzed erratically: 'Welcome', it declared. François read the word with a bitter taste in his mouth.  

Inside, the air reeked of mildew and despair. The walls wept with moisture, a constant seepage from pipes that no one had bothered to repair. Their rooms were austere, barely more than bunks and battered desks. François unpacked in silence, his movements mechanical, his thoughts elsewhere.  

Sylvette, in the adjoining room, wasted no time surveying her space with a faint curl of distaste. His wife barely looked at him when he brought her a ration pack from the dwindling supply downstairs.  

“Thank you,” she murmured, her voice clipped.  

Her thanks felt like an accusation.  

---

The days passed in a grim rhythm. François kept himself busy cataloguing troop deployments, studying crumbling maps, and noting the positions of alien incursions. It was work that gave the illusion of importance, a distraction from the gnawing sense that they were part of something larger, something monstrous, and that their ignorance was deliberate.  

Sylvette approached her duties with the same detached competence that had characterised their marriage. She conducted interviews with exhausted soldiers and defeated colonists, extracting facts with surgical precision. No warmth, no pity—just a cold professionalism that left even the most battle-hardened survivors uneasy.  

Violette, by contrast, moved through the ruins like a spark of life. She spoke to everyone: children scavenging among the wreckage, soldiers gripping their rifles like talismans, medics patching wounds they knew would never fully heal. She listened; she consoled; she smiled. François caught himself watching her too often, drawn by the way her presence seemed to soften the edges of despair.  

He felt the weight of her gaze, too - gentle, probing, yet unrelenting. When she spoke to him, she chose her words carefully, as if aware of the fortress he had built around himself.  

“You’re carrying too much, François,” she said one evening, her voice quiet but insistent.  

“Everyone here is,” he replied, unwilling to look at her.  

“Not like you.”  

---

The attack came at dusk, when the sky burned with the strange hues of the planet’s dying sun. The first explosion shattered the stillness, followed by a hailstorm of shrapnel and fire. François reacted instinctively, shielding Sylvette as debris rained down.  

When the tremors ceased, she shoved him off.  

“Don’t coddle me,” she hissed, her face pale, her breathing ragged.  

He wanted to argue but held back. She had grown so brittle, so remote, and yet he could still see the faint flicker of defiance that had once drawn him to her.  

Two days later, she collapsed.  

François found her in the street, her hands clutching her chest, her lips drawn tight with pain. He knelt beside her, shouting for help, but none came.  

Her eyes fixed on him, and for a fleeting moment, he thought he saw something softening in her gaze. But then the light faded, leaving only the hollow shell of a woman who had despised him even as she needed him.  

---

After the funeral - a perfunctory affair in a settlement too battered for ceremony - François retreated to his room. He sat in silence, the weight of Sylvette’s death pressing down on him.  

“You couldn’t have saved her,” Violette said. She stood in the doorway, her voice steady, her expression open.  

“I failed her,” he replied, his voice raw. “I failed her every day of our marriage.”  

“You stayed,” Violette said. “That means something.”  

He looked at her then, really looked. There was no judgement in her gaze, only an unguarded warmth that felt like a balm on his wounds.  

---

That night, the truth revealed itself.  

When they came together, it was not out of passion but necessity, a union forged by shared grief and a strange, unspoken compulsion. The moment their skin touched, the air seemed to shimmer.  

Memories not their own surged through their minds: laboratories, gene splicing, whispered conversations about a “biotic solution.” They saw their own bodies, altered and prepared for a final act of transformation.  

“We were made for this,” Violette whispered, her voice trembling in dawning realisation.  

Their bodies began to change. Pain and ecstasy blurred as flesh gave way to something new: roots, fibres, seeds. By dawn, the room was empty, save for a scattering of pods that glistened in the pale light.  

---

The invaders swept into the settlement, their grotesque forms moving with chilling precision. They did not notice the seeds carried by the wind, nor the roots that spread beneath their feet.  

Within days, the ecosystem turned against them. Plants erupted from the soil, vines choking their machines, toxins seeping into the air. The invaders faltered, then fell, consumed by a planet that had been weaponised against them.  

François and Violette awoke within the growing forest, their consciousnesses intertwined. They were no longer human, but something greater—a single will bound to the planet itself.  

Together, they watched as life returned to Desmona IV. Together, they would ensure it endured.


Author’s note: A Young Adult story written from multiple, detailed draft-prompts by ChatGPT (in Writer mode). It has few pretensions to true literary quality. But all the more readable for that. The plot is, strangely, based on a true story.

Wednesday, September 11, 2024

“Paramnesia” by Adam Carlton (intro)

From ChatGPT

Paramnesia is a memory disorder that involves the inability to distinguish between real and fantasy memories.

"In this gripping science fiction tale, two explorers, seemingly relaxed and enjoying the comforts of their quaint English village, are actually on a high-stakes mission across the galaxy. Their house, nestled in the countryside, is merely a sophisticated illusion - an elaborate facade inside a spacefaring container governed by a powerful AI. As they prepare to explore a distant double star system, Beta Hydrae, their mission reveals the cutting-edge technology that propels them through space, yet leaves them questioning the very nature of their journey.

"Their exploration is anything but casual. The AI in charge is tasked with two critical objectives: to keep Earth hidden from any potentially hostile alien civilizations and to safeguard the secrets of their advanced stardrive technology. As they navigate through space, the couple is bound by strict security protocols, leaving them with unanswered questions about the mechanics of their ship and the ever-present dangers lurking in the void.

"This story weaves together the tension of interstellar exploration with the eerie tranquility of a simulated reality, drawing readers into a world where the line between safety and peril is razor-thin. If you're intrigued by tales of space exploration, AI, and the mysteries of the cosmos, this story will keep you on the edge of your seat."


You may also be interested in my new contemporary short story:

Read “Souvenirs d'Annette”.


You will find my collection of short stories, published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

"Freyja’s Deathbed Conversations: and other stories" (2019)

and my SF novel, also published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

Feel free to purchase both!


Wednesday, July 17, 2024

"Allopath" by Adam Carlton

Adam Carlton here. In between the present excitement in France, the disintegration of the Nouveau Front populaire, I thought I would share with you one of the stories from my first published collection, available to you as a PDF here.

It was written in homage to Greg Bear's "Queen of Angels".



I take her hand - her fingers rest inertly on my palm. 


I lean across to kiss her lips - her head moves slightly to avoid my touch.

I reach my arm out to embrace her - my wife lies rigid and does not respond.

---

At breakfast this morning she was sullen and withdrawn. Yesterday she was aggressive and contemptuous. I never properly anticipate how much these things affect me; how much they screw around with my ability to think.

Must concentrate.

My first one today is a psychopath.

---

The psychopath is wired up on the table. I’m in the simulator: there are joysticks, sliders, buttons. The rising whine in my earphones is the system booting up. I'm about to enter my patient's subconscious.

The magnetic stimulators grasp the patient’s cortex, sculpting a setting for today's therapy. In the VR abstraction I see the patient as he sees himself: a vastly inflated, supersized body surrounded by dwarfed figurines of his sexual partners and hangers-on.

In a normal person, all those agents are similar. Normal empathy does its work: mirror neurons. This guy is nothing like that. He's the übermensch. His brain models everyone else as robots with paste-on human faces. Inside their chests are dials .. he's playing at adjusting them now.

He's quite the expert, I remind myself.

We've never met. Thankfully, he has no image of me, isn't aware of my presence. Not yet.

There's no cure for psychopathy. You can see why just looking at his deviant brain. Our controversial treatment is there to mitigate harm to others. Ego depletion therapy. In layman's terms I'm going to burn away that part of his brain which drives aggression, charisma and force of character. This man entered my theatre as a dangerous predator. He’ll leave as a timorous mouse.

I move in closer, centre the joystick on his self-persona, focus a reticle on his heart, select aggression/charisma and push the slider way up. Press the fire button.

In the simulation I hear pulsed gunfire.

In the world of the operating theatre, the AI maps the corresponding neural circuits, aims the lasers. The beam-constellation - tuned to penetrate the skull - converges to the target zone .. which starts to cook and die.

The brain has no pain sensors. The psychopath nevertheless feels something, some imbalance, a degradation of self-energy. You might think he would personify me as a baleful, fire-breathing dragon. But there is truth in the undermind, not physics. He can’t see the lasers, he only feels their effects

He pictures me as a worm-parasite, a lamprey with band-saw teeth, sucking at his life-force.

He scowls, raises his hands to grasp my black slimy body, to tear me loose .. yet he's deflating, weakening. Part of my skill is to know when to stop.

He still has to function afterwards.

I spit him out.

---

My wife also works at the hospital. She's in administration, budgets. I'm having my lunch when I get the call. She's collapsed, an emergency scan has identified a life-threatening brain tumour.

Normally we wouldn't ask, there's a conflict of interest, but it's urgent and you're here .. .

So I'm wired. Back in harness. My estranged, distant wife unconscious on the operating table.

I've never visited my wife's mind-country. Unbearably intrusive. Quite unethical. In the old days this would have been a difficult, dangerous and risky operation. The tumour, though small, is buried deep within the limbic/brain-stem boundary.

The AI knows about the tumour. It's accessed the scan data. Together we'll track the cauterisation. I'll watch the psychological effects as the physical malignancy is excised. I'll precisely calibrate the boundaries of the burn.

The system powers up; status goes to green. I'm projected in-country and to my surprise it's our bedroom. She has subconsciously construed her incapacity as sleepiness .. and conjured up somewhere appropriate.

Readouts show the burn has already started. With the decrease of pressure her breathing is already stabilising. She knows me of course, I inhabit her ‘husband’ subpersonality.

I advance towards the bed.

Are you awake, kid? How are you feeling?”

I don't know if I'm the husband or the surgeon in here. There's a reason we don't do this.

Her eyes open. She focuses, catches sight of me, recoils and screams. I see myself in a mirror - see myself as she sees me.

My breath catches .. I am hideous.

A pink, fleshy polyp, crowned with a frond of sharp tiny teeth, swaying and looming towards her.

She backs away .. hyperventilating .. recoiling.

I bow in desperate supplication and back off. My eyes flick between my wife - visibly gaining in strength -  and my own worm-self, detumescing by the second.

An alert from the AI. It thinks it's done. I toggle the switch to cease the burn.

Simultaneously I'm ejected from her mind.

Removing the helmet, I see her wheeled out to intensive care. It's mostly precautionary. We're done here.

All the bad bits have been burned out.

---

What did it all mean?

The textbooks would say:

The tumour caused distortions in emotional response and erratic behaviour. Later, as it grew larger, pressure on the brain stem caused her physical collapse.

It all makes sense of course. Yet somehow, I felt that things were a bit more complex, more nuanced in there.

---

I hasten to visit her, enter her private room. She’s propped up, quite conscious, looking surprisingly well.

Hi kid,” I say, “How’re you feeling?”

She looks at me blankly.

Who the hell are you?



You will find my collection of short stories, published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

"Freyja’s Deathbed Conversations: and other stories" (2019)

and my SF novel, also published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

Feel free to purchase both!


Tuesday, December 21, 2021

"Donatien's Children" - new SF novel by Adam Carlton

Link to PDF

I have now completed the text for this, my first science-fiction novel (I published a book of short stories in 2019: Freyja’s Deathbed Conversations: and other stories).

"Donatien's Children" is now available on Amazon as a Kindle eBook - the paperback version will be there in a day or two, but you may read the novel for free by following the link below the image above (PDF). Let me know if you find any typos or errors which need attention via comments below.

Here's a summary of the book: first the blurb and then a longer guide. It will answer your first question: Donatien?

---

Donatien's Children

Introduction

The StarDrop Corporation emerged from nowhere offering new technologies for fusion power, spaceflight and synthetic life. Petra Schelling, teen chess prodigy, was recruited by an intelligence agency to spy on StarDrop - before vanishing. James Melrose, her controller, is told that losing an agent is regrettable but it happens. But why has Petra now become a high-profile StarDrop agent of influence?

StarDrop’s Artificial People are suddenly everywhere in entertainment, the media, politics and top jobs. Friendly, attractive and smart, they are indispensable in tough assignments such as the mission investigating an anomaly on the larger Martian moon, where an artefact suggests StarDrop might be of extraterrestrial origin.

Élise and Mireille Fossey: two sisters, one a journalist, the other a researcher. For Élise, StarDrop will lead her into more than lethal peril; for Mireille, the corporation may be humanity's finest opportunity... or maybe a deadly, existential threat.

---

Themes

Prologue:        I’m Not Awake - 2022

Part 1: La Maîtresse des Échecs - 2023

Part 2: Petra - 2028 (winter to autumn)

Intermission: Mother Christmas (2029)

Part 3: La Double Inconstance (2030 winter to 2031 summer)

Part 4: La Philosophie dans le Salon (2032 spring-summer)

---

Part 1 considers what remains of a competitive activity when the machines have comprehensively surpassed human-level performance; and the nature of an equilibrium when you can always win through cheating. I had cycling - road racing - and Lance Armstrong in mind when I wrote this part.

Part 2 leverages my own experiences working in an industrial research lab, although nothing remotely as exciting ever occurred. Petra is very loosely modelled after my divisional director; other characters are also variants of colleagues.

Part 3 follows the theme of La Double Inconstance, a romantic comedy by French playwright Pierre de Marivaux first performed in 1723. A young woman, Sylvia, is kidnapped from her lover, Arlequin, by the Prince who intends to marry her. Through a complex series of engagements the Prince and his smart female servant Flaminia conspire to break the Sylvia-Arlequin relationship, resulting in a switch of partners.*

Part 4 follows (very loosely!) a theme from La Philosophie dans le Boudoir, published in 1795 by Donatien Alphonse François, Marquis de Sade. Set in a bedroom, the two lead characters argue that the only moral system that reinforces the recent (1789) French revolution is libertinism. Dolmancé is the most dominant (and evil) of the characters in the dialogues. Eugénie (a fifteen year old) has been sent by her father to be corrupted by him and his associates into libertine ways. The fifth section, a lengthy political monologue, comprises de Sade’s manifesto.*

That short book - French and English versions freely available in PDF format on the Internet - is almost unreadably graphic in places in its gleeful accounts of the most depraved sexual practices. Considered pornographic for centuries, it is now considered an extreme polemic on sexual politics. 

---

* Some of the text here edited from the corresponding Wikipedia articles.