I asked Gemini to summarise this review from Frank Hoffman, which is quite long, into something more succinct:
"Jack Watling's book, "The Arms of the Future: Technology and Close Combat in the Twenty-First Century," tackles a critical question: how should armies adapt to the changing face of war? Warfare is becoming more lethal, with new drone technologies and a renewed focus on urban combat. Watling argues that armies are not keeping pace, clinging to outdated structures and simply adding new tech on top.
The book proposes a complete overhaul of force design. Part 1 dives into the future battlefield, analyzing increased transparency due to sensor technology, the limitations of armor in the face of rising lethality, and the enduring challenges of urban warfare.
Part 2 gets practical, outlining a new force structure with four key subsystems: maneuver, fires, assault, and support. This new design emphasizes dispersed formations for better survivability, increased lethality to counter enemy firepower, and the ability to adapt to the unique demands of urban combat. It also integrates drones more seamlessly and calls for lighter, more agile armored vehicles.
Importantly, Watling doesn't advocate abandoning traditional maneuver tactics. He acknowledges the role of armor but emphasizes overcoming its limitations through clever tactics that create ambiguity and deception.
"The Arms of the Future" is a well-researched book that draws on real-world conflicts and the insights of military experts. While it doesn't delve into unconventional warfare or address the specific needs of special operations forces, it offers a wealth of practical solutions and raises important questions about how armies should be structured for the future battlefield. This book is a must-read for policymakers and military personnel serious about adapting to the ever-changing nature of war. It provides a strong foundation for further discussion and experimentation on how to build a military that can thrive in the coming decades."
---
I would add: the book is undeniably important. Its focus on military architecture and logistics shows a deep comprehension for the realities of sustainable warfighting. However, it is written for military strategy professionals: jargon-rich and abstract in tone. It requires sustained attention.
My concern is that it captures a moment in time, where robotic/autonomous sensor/effector systems and AI synthesis/analysis systems have capabilities impossible to ignore, but not at capability to replace trained soldiers in any current department of warfare.
But progress is exceptionally rapid: what will the situation look like in five or ten years time?
The problem is that re-engineering a major power's military is a generational process, measured in decades. It seems clear that the journey Watling has charted must be followed, but substantial course corrections seem likely within successive five year windows.
Will military bureaucracies be up for the challenge, not just of change but of changing change?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated. Keep it polite and no gratuitous links to your business website - we're not a billboard here.