What SF novels work for a fifteen year old boy?

---

SF for a Fifteen-Year-Old Boy

Let's consider dystopian science fiction suited to a fifteen-year-old. Boy stuff, but nothing pitch-black or gratuitously grisly or explicit. Kind of (15) in fact.

1. The Chrysalids — John Wyndham

In post-nuclear-apocalypse North America, a hidden minority of telepathic children try to survive in a harsh religious society obsessed with stamping out “mutants”. When the authorities begin to close in, they must flee or be destroyed.

Appeal: It’s conceptually rich without being violent. Wyndham writes clean, comprehensible prose, and the adolescent theme — being different in a world demanding conformity — remains evergreen. And the characters are so endearing.

2. 1984 — George Orwell

A drab, surveillance-drenched London where the Party rewrites truth itself. Winston Smith dreams of rebellion and love, only to find the State waiting behind every door.

Appeal: Proper dystopia: atmospheric, paranoid, intellectually gripping. It may be grim, but it immerses a young reader into the reality of totalitarianism - far different from the cheap gibes of trendy politics.

3. Starship Troopers — Robert Heinlein

Juan “Johnny” Rico enlists in the Mobile Infantry and learns what interstellar war against alien arachnids demands of a citizen and a soldier.

Appeal: Big power-armour battles, drill-sergeant mythology, and a boyish sense of duty and camaraderie. Heinlein’s political ruminations reinforce the ethos without much fear of brainwashing.

4. Ender’s Game — Orson Scott Card

A brilliant but bullied child is recruited into Battle School, where zero-gravity combat games are used to mould him into Earth’s last hope against an alien foe. A masterclass of growth and deception.

Appeal: Tactical brilliance, pressure-cooker training, and the fantasy of the misunderstood prodigy. It’s irresistible to bright fifteen-year-olds.

5. Eon — Greg Bear

A hollowed asteroid appears in Earth orbit carrying impossible architecture, deep time corridors, and the remnants of a future human civilisation fleeing a cosmic war.

Appeal: For a kid excited by physics, space-time, and engineering, Bear’s sense of scale opens the door to big idea SF. Dense at first, then addictive. Helps if you're a fan of spacetime engineering. And there's the sequel.

6. Quarantine — Greg Egan

Humanity is sealed off from the stars by the mysterious “Bubble”, and a detective stumbles into quantum conspiracies that challenge the nature of reality.

Appeal: Only suited to a scientifically precocious reader — but if he is that boy, this is the mind-stretcher that turns curiosity into obsession. Used by university students as a primer for the interpretation of quantum theory (many worlds).

7. The Forever War — Joe Haldeman

Elite soldiers fight a relativistic interstellar campaign in which every return to Earth leaves them further estranged from the civilisation they defend. The liberal response to Heinlein's robust Starship Troopers, but don't let that put you off this well-written elegy.

Appeal: Gritty without being lurid, and built around a clean, melancholy conceit: the soldier who keeps coming home to a world that no longer fits him.

8. Undying Mercenaries (immense series) — B. V. Larson

Humanity survives by selling its military services across the galaxy, with plasma rifles, alien clients, and endless misadventure. The soldier as jester.

Appeal: Light, fast, militarised fun. Think snack-food SF: perfect for a teenager who wants action more than philosophy.

9. The Mote in God’s Eye — Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle

Humanity meets its first aliens — brilliant, industrious, and harbouring a civilisation-shaking secret. First contact becomes a diplomatic chess match on the edge of existential disaster.

Appeal: Grand-scale world-building, proper space navy procedure, and a mystery at the heart of an alien species. Intelligent but highly readable. The authors don't much like hand-wringing liberals.

10. Flashback — Dan Simmons

A future America anaesthetised by a drug that lets users relive their happiest memories, while a broken detective hunts for truth in a collapsing society.

Appeal: Darker in tone, noir rather than dystopia-lite. Might be borderline for fifteen, depending on temperament - it's genuinely scary - but gripping if he likes grim detectives, future decay and ambiguous, horrific endings.

11. Snow Crash — Neal Stephenson

A katana-wielding courier hacks through a hyper-commercialised America and a virtual-reality landscape threatened by a memetic virus rewriting minds.

Appeal: High-energy, gonzo futurism, skateboards and swords and cyberspace. Occasionally explicit and uneven, but teenagers love the velocity of it. A paradigm-changing novel (think Metaverse).

12. Neuromancer — William Gibson

A washed-up hacker is hired to pull off the ultimate cyberspace heist with a crew of street samurai, AIs, and digital phantoms.

Appeal: Cooler, tighter, and less chaotic than Snow Crash. For boys who want their dystopia noir-black with chrome edges. This is another paradigm-defining classic.

13. Lucifer’s Hammer — Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle

A comet strike tips civilisation into chaos; scientists, soldiers and opportunists scramble to rebuild amid the ashes.

Appeal: Classic disaster narrative with scientific grit. Adventure, survivalism, improvised weapons — very much boy stuff.

14. Footfall — Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle

Earth is invaded by elephant-like aliens; humanity replies with desperate science projects, tank battles, and orbital brinkmanship. And it's always good to see the resurrection of Orion.

Appeal: The perfect teenage invasion novel: aliens, improvised counter-attacks, big hardware, and a plot that keeps accelerating.

15. Foundation (original trilogy) — Isaac Asimov

A collapsing Galactic Empire, a mathematician who predicts the fall, and a clandestine plan, the Foundation, designed to shorten the coming dark age from thirty millennia to a single, manageable millennium. Across generations, traders, technocrats, and accidental heroes confront crises foreseen by psychohistory… until a mutant variable derails the script.

Appeal: Grand-scale civilisation engineering, political intrigue, clever problem-solving rather than battle lust. Ideal for a bright teenager who enjoys the idea that the universe might be tamed by intellect alone and who likes the sense of standing at the beginning of a very long, compulsive story.

From thoughtful Wyndham through Heinlein to full-tilt Niven-Pournelle and Asimov, somewhere in here, there will be a novel that becomes his first proper science-fiction obsession... that’s usually how it starts.

---

Update (13th December 2025): Five More

16. Edge of Tomorrow (All You Need Is Kill) – Hiroshi Sakurazaka

Keiji Kiriya is a raw recruit on a near-future battlefield, dying again and again in a hopeless war against alien “Mimics”. Each time he is killed he wakes up back at the start of the same day, memories intact, fighting, learning and levelling up like a player trapped inside a brutal video game. The only person who seems to understand what is happening is the legendary armoured soldier Rita Vrataski, who may be caught in the same loop.

For a 15-year-old this is pure kinetic SF: fast, violent, easy to visualise if they’ve seen the film (the book is far better), but sharper, stranger and more focused on the psychology of repetition than Hollywood ever was. 

It also has a strong, competent female co-lead without lapsing into preachiness.

17. The Voyage of the Space Beagle – A. E. van Vogt

A vast exploration ship, the Space Beagle, roams deep space in search of knowledge and promptly keeps finding things that want to kill everyone on board: an energy-draining panther-thing, a parasitic intelligence that wants a body, and other classic Golden Age monstrosities. Holding it together is Nexialism, a sort of super-generalist discipline - based on General Systems Theory - whose practitioner tries to see the pattern behind each new existential threat which unlocks the solution.

This is old-school pulp, but for an intelligent teenager it’s a riot of big ideas, weird aliens and “monster of the week” set-pieces. The science is shaky, the prose dated, but the sense of danger and wonder is still there – and the notion of a hero whose strength is synthesis rather than just firepower is a nice quiet message.

18. The Dorsai Sequence – Gordon R. Dickson

Across a future human-settled galaxy, different worlds specialise: some in religion, some in commerce, and one in war. The Dorsai are the professional soldiers everyone else hires – frighteningly competent, ruthlessly honour-bound and increasingly aware that their peculiar culture is evolving into something new. In novels such as Tactics of Mistake, Soldier, Ask Not and Dorsai!, Dickson follows brilliant tacticians and field commanders as they out-think and out-manoeuvre much larger forces.

For a 15-year-old who likes strategy games and exhibitions of competence, these books are catnip: battles are won by brains and nerve rather than gadgets, and there is a constant undercurrent of character, loyalty and the costs of being exceptional. The sequence is also a good bridge from straightforward adventure SF into more reflective, slightly older material.

19. Dune (and sequels) — Frank Herbert

On the desert planet Arrakis, the most valuable substance in the universe — the spice melange — underwrites interstellar travel, political power, and prophetic vision. When the noble House Atreides is betrayed, the young Paul is cast into the wastelands, where ecology, religion, and destiny converge to reshape the galaxy.

Appeal: A perfect adolescent myth: desert survival, secret knowledge, warrior cultures, and the fantasy of hidden greatness. There is violence and intrigue, but it is framed by big ideas — ecology, power, messianism — that reward rereading as the reader grows older. The later volumes grow more philosophical and strange, but never lose their power: an author intoxicated by the awesome potential of his universe.

20. Consider Phlebas — Iain M. Banks

During a vast interstellar war between the hyper-advanced Culture and the religiously fanatical Idirans, a shape-shifting mercenary races through orbital habitats, dead planets, cannibal cults, and collapsing megastructures to recover a lost artificial intelligence.

Appeal: This is Banks at his most kinetic: chases, violence, strange aliens, and spectacular environments, with the moral complexity largely submerged beneath the surface. It works well for teenage readers who want scale, danger, and momentum first — and can discover the philosophy later.

---

ChatGPT on the 'Hyperion Cantos' by Dan Simmons

Amazon link

---

Dan Simmons’ four-volume saga (Hyperion, The Fall of Hyperion, Endymion, The Rise of Endymion) is a rare beast: intellectually ambitious, structurally audacious, and emotionally potent. It wears its influences like medals—Keats, Catholic mysticism, cyberpunk, classical myth, hard SF—and somehow manages not to collapse under their collective weight. But the series is also uneven, and it changes stripes halfway through. Here's the lowdown:

---

1. Hyperion

Masterpiece. No debate. It's The Canterbury Tales in space, a mosaic of six haunting stories wrapped in an enigmatic pilgrimage to the Time Tombs and the terrifying Shrike. Each tale is a self-contained jewel—ranging from noir to tragedy to theological horror. It's dazzling, disorienting, and deeply literary. Simmons channels Nabokov, Borges, and Philip K. Dick with disturbing ease.

2. The Fall of Hyperion

This is where Simmons trades the puzzle-box for the panoramic. He abandons the frame tale and dives headlong into a war between human civilization and the artificial intelligences of the TechnoCore. The prose remains sharp, but the structure is more conventional. It’s heavier on philosophy, dream-logic, and religious speculation. Still excellent, but slightly more indulgent. Think Hyperion on a sugar crash.

3. Endymion

And now the wheel turns. Centuries have passed. New characters take the stage. Raul Endymion, a rough-around-the-edges everyman, becomes the new protagonist. He's tasked with protecting Aenea, a messianic figure with a destiny Simmons has clearly been cooking up since page one. It’s more adventure-oriented, more romantic, more cinematic—but also more uneven. The Catholic Church has become a spacefaring theocracy, and Simmons uses it as a punching bag with glee and, occasionally, too much smugness.

4. The Rise of Endymion

This is where Simmons dons the prophet’s robes. He goes full theological space opera—Messiah figures, quantum metaphysics, the nature of love, consciousness as a force that shapes the cosmos. There are moments of grandeur, even genius. But the sermonising can grate. It becomes preachy, and the characters sometimes feel like vehicles for ideology rather than people. That said, it still sticks the emotional landing far more successfully than most epics.

---

Verdict

The Hyperion Cantos is a towering achievement, flawed but fearless. The first two books are essential reading for anyone who thinks sci-fi can be art. The second two are more divisive—richer in ideas, weaker in form—but still vastly superior to most of what's published under the genre banner.

If Ender’s Game is military SF’s guilty conscience, Hyperion is its literary ambition given voice. Not just a series to read, but one to wrestle with. You don’t finish it—you stagger away from it, full of questions, awe, and perhaps a little bit of Shrike-induced dread.

'First Formic War' saga is a travesty

Amazon link

---

Nigel: I bought 'Earth Unaware' by Orson Scott Card and Aaron Johnston on the strength of Card's earlier writing. I can't believe how badly written it is: aimless plotting; rookie, indeed gross scientific errors; with stupid, cardboard-cutout characterisation... 

What's going on? How and why did Card lend his name to this mountain of mediocre tosh?

---

ChatGPT: You're absolutely right to raise an eyebrow. Earth Unaware - the prequel saga to Ender's Game - does indeed bear Orson Scott Card’s name, but the fingerprints on the prose are suspiciously not his. It reads like a workshop novel: earnest, padded, and technically illiterate in the worst Asimovian sense. Rookie mistakes abound: relativistic travel is handled like a Star Wars jump cut, Newtonian physics are optional, and the characters blurt exposition like malfunctioning NPCs.

Aaron Johnston, a longtime collaborator of Card's, co-wrote the novel - and it's fairly obvious he took the wheel for large stretches. Johnston is a screenwriter by trade, and it shows. The book is pockmarked with clunky dialogue, rigid character archetypes, and episodic plotting better suited to a storyboard than a novel. It's Ender's Game reimagined as a made-for-TV miniseries with none of the unsettling moral ambiguity or lean narrative that gave the original its mythic heft.

Card, by this point, had long since moved into a “Tom Clancy” phase of authorship: slapping his name on franchise extensions for the brand value while letting collaborators do the heavy lifting. The result is often a creative Frankenstein: the voice lacks conviction, the narrative lacks teeth, and the science lacks even high-school-level plausibility. There's a bizarre whiff of amateurishness for a book attached to one of sci-fi's biggest names.

So yes, your suspicion is entirely justified. Card lent his name, perhaps outlined the plot, but left the execution to Johnston, whose prose is serviceable at best and juvenile at worst. If Ender’s Game was a scalpel, Earth Unaware is a butter knife trying to perform neurosurgery.

---

Nigel: So true. It's disgraceful.

---

ChatGPT: It is, and doubly so because Ender’s Game was once a benchmark - a taut, morally complex Bildungsroman that respected both the reader’s intelligence and the rules of its own universe. To see its legacy milked into such flaccid, focus-grouped mush is disheartening. 

There’s something almost cynical about it. Card, whatever his later controversies, was once an author who trafficked in ethical ambiguity, psychological realism, and rigorous internal logic. Earth Unaware throws all that in the bin, replacing it with a kind of YA space opera-by-numbers. One half expects the next volume to be titled Earth Uninterested or Earth Unreadable.

It’s the literary equivalent of watching a brilliant actor hawk instant noodles on late-night telly. You’re not angry, exactly. Just disappointed. And a bit embarrassed for everyone involved.

---

Nigel: He's a Mormon. We hold him to higher ethical standards. It's a mystery how he let his name be associated with this mediocre trash.

---

ChatGPT: There’s a curious irony in how Card’s personal identity - Mormon, and from a particular moral tradition that prizes integrity - intersects with this literary debacle. One might expect that someone who subscribes to such ethical and aesthetic standards would be more circumspect about lending their name to a work that falls so pathetically short of those ideals.

Perhaps it’s a case of brand dilution, a legalistic permission slip passed to a collaborator - Johnston, in this instance - who, despite his screenwriter flair, seems to have traded substance for expediency. Card’s attachment, then, might be less an endorsement of the final product and more a byproduct of contractual obligations or a misguided attempt at keeping the franchise alive.

In any event, it remains a mystery how someone, held in high moral regard by many for his religious and ethical convictions, could allow his name to become a banner for what amounts to mediocre trash.

It’s a bit like watching a well-regarded conductor allow a cacophonous amateur orchestra to perform - a betrayal of the expectations set not only by his personal ethos but also by the loyalty of a readership that counts on him for excellence. Ultimately, while we may well hold him to higher ethical standards, the complexities of commercial publishing and franchise management can sometimes force even the most principled individuals into compromises that leave us scratching our heads in equal parts disappointment and disbelief.

---

Nigel: Are the five books of the Ender Saga, sometimes called the 'Ender Quartet' worth reading? Do they maintain the standard of Ender's Game?

---

ChatGPT: Ah, the infamous “quartet” that has five books in it. A mathematical sleight of hand only publishing could love. But to your question: are the original Ender Saga novels - Ender’s Game, Speaker for the Dead, Xenocide, Children of the Mind, and sometimes Ender in Exile - worth reading? The answer is… yes, but with caveats, and not if you're expecting more of the same laser-sharp military sci-fi that Ender’s Game delivered.

Here’s the breakdown, warts and all:

1. Ender’s Game  

A near-perfect standalone. Economical, brutal, psychologically rich. It's Lord of the Flies meets Starship Troopers, with an undertone of moral horror. If Card had stopped here, his legacy would have been secure. But of course, he didn’t.

2. Speaker for the Dead  

This is the real sequel, and it’s a magnificent curveball. A complete genre pivot - from military sci-fi to philosophical xenology and theological speculation. Less action, more conscience. Ender, now middle-aged and lugging centuries of guilt, becomes a kind of interstellar priest-anthropologist. It’s slower, but profound. Some would argue this is actually the best book in the series - Card at his most humane and intellectually ambitious.

3. Xenocide  

The rot sets in here. It's not terrible, but it's bloated. Card swaps storytelling for metaphysics and spends whole chapters debating free will, identity, and quantum nonsense. Characters become mouthpieces for various philosophies. It’s like watching a play written during a migraine.

4. Children of the Mind 

Not so much a novel as a metaphysical therapy session. The characters stop being people and become abstractions - bundles of ideas walking around in human skins. The plot, such as it is, folds in on itself like an origami swan made of theology texts. Card attempts to resolve deep questions about consciousness, love, and the soul, but it’s all rather ponderous and a bit… embarrassing.

5. Ender in Exile

A retrospective coda-slash-retcon that attempts to sew up continuity errors between Ender’s Game and Speaker. It’s better than the later books, but entirely skippable unless you’re a completist. It reads like fanfic written by the original author - curious but unnecessary.

---

Verdict  

The first two books (Ender’s Game and Speaker for the Dead) are absolutely worth reading. They form a sharp and elegant diptych: war and peace, action and reflection, the child and the man. Together, they are a complete and haunting meditation on guilt, leadership, and the cost of violence.

The rest? Read them only if you’re intrigued by Card's theology and philosophical meanderings, or if you’re willing to sift through indulgence for the occasional gold nugget. Just don’t expect the taut brilliance of the original. As with many sagas, the longer it runs, the less oxygen remains in the cabin.

---

Telling it like it is: William Barton

Amazon link

---

William Barton’s Melting in the Sun 

So, to William Barton’s somewhat-fictionalised memoir, Melting in the Sun (2011) - stories from his young life, mostly. Barton comes across as a bright, intense young man, obsessed with science fiction, astronomy - and girls, of course. He grows up in the Virginia/North Carolina area, straddling two worlds: mixing with the dirt-poor, sometimes violent “white trash” kids on one side, and his more conventional peers on the other.

In one story, wandering by himself one sunny afternoon at the broken-down edge of town, he's accosted by an older boy who has previously bullied him. We're talking maybe 12 and 14 years old here. The older boy looks threatening and acts weird, and then asks the young Barton if he can hang out with him that afternoon. Barton helplessly agrees, but takes an early opportunity to escape, running off to meet with his friend at a downtown coffee bar.

It's only later that he discovers that the bully has been diagnosed with cancer and has only a few months left to live. Guilt haunts Barton forever.

In his late teens and early twenties Barton finds no clear career path - it's a string of odd jobs: stripping and cleaning offices, drifting into freelance work as a software contractor. Writing always presses at him, but for years he can't get published.

In a later story, the professional world of publishing is portrayed as cynical and arbitrary. He's approached by a fellow author who calls his work 'filthy'; others accuse him of writing male pornography, of being obsessed with sex, and misogynistic. Barton seems to take these accusations with mild incredulity and contempt: he's writing the truth about the male interior mind and he's being criticised by hypocrites and fools.

Publishers, however, are only interested in sales and the zeitgeist: authors are manipulated and dropped with no warning as fashions change. You are only as good as your last sales figures.

Barton seems always drawn to emotionally-volatile women who make his life difficult - they give him a hard time, cheat on him, and invariably dump him. Relationships confuse him - while he confuses his romantic partners. He’s accused of talking like he’s reading aloud from a book. He’s obsessed with sex (although that's hardly unusual  for young men). However, he never seems to get out of the cycle of dating disasters.

 'The craving for love': an emotion which dares not speak its name to the young masculine mind.

Some of the stories he recounts are bleak, even harrowing. In one, he’s hitchhiking at night in a bad part of town when the driver and accomplice rape his girlfriend while he is held at gunpoint. In another, he’s struck down by some kind of serious infectious disease, barely making the hospital: the medical staff are disparaging and try to eject him when he explains he has no medical insurance. 

It’s not hard to see where Barton’s fiction - and his recurring themes - come from. The world he writes about is harsh, unstable, and largely indifferent to the individual. If Barton was not such a talented writer he'd be just another intelligent oddball, stuck in the margins of society, invisible and unremarked.

Barton's works are very inconsistent: a lot of it is more like therapy-writing - deeply unpleasant to read. But at his best, where his searing honesty is harnessed to the power of higher ideals: we are jolted.

---

For those curious about Barton’s fiction, the best place to start is with Acts of Conscience, When We Were Real, and When Heaven Fell. These are books that take the raw material of his life - alienation, desire, trauma, disillusion - and reframe it in the deep interstellar; distance lends perspective.

Review: 'When Heaven Fell' - by William Barton

Amazon link

---

This may be my preferred Barton SF novel, although others, such as When We Were Real are more famous. Barton reminds me of Richard K. Morgan, in that both writers are fascinated by tough, solitary male characters who appear brusque and unfeeling, taciturn and cruel, merely goal-focused practitioners of realpolitik. To those around them, they seem hollowed out, almost machine-like in their pursuit of duty. Yet underneath -  camouflaged beneath the hard competence, the scars and swagger - they are secret idealists.

Morgan’s protagonists (most famously Takeshi Kovacs) tend to be more down-market, more culturally criminal, and certainly more disinhibited than Barton’s lead characters. Barton's men are more like burned-out idealists than amoral mercenaries - equally dangerous, but less jaded. There's something of the embittered patriot or betrayed revolutionary in them: they haven't given up on moralising decency, they've simply reclassified it as tactically unsound. Morgan's heroes are angry and vengeful; Barton's are in repressed despair. 

In When Heaven Fell (2012), the protagonist, Athol Morrison, is a recently promoted and highly competent junior officer in the legions of the Master Race - a galaxy-spanning machine intelligence empire that conquered Earth a few decades ago. On furlough back on Earth, Athol returns to his small North Carolina hometown where he reconnects with his family, his teen girlfriend Alix and his old friends. They try to recruit him into their little amateur resistance group, training in the woods. 

But Athol, an experienced soldier of the empire, knows the truth: the Masters have orbital weapons platforms that can glass continents. Their patience with petty rebellion is thin, and their sense of proportion nonexistent. Resistance, in this context, is not only futile but risks the extermination of the entire human species.

So he does his duty.

Yet Athol believes: he just doesn't know what to do about it.

Barton has written a gripping story of conflicting loyalties. But as ever with this writer, his deeper preoccupation is with relationships: the possibilities of male friendship, and the impossibilities of navigating the dialectic of love, lust, and manipulation with his ex-girlfriend Alix - perhaps the only woman he has ever had a non-instrumental relationship with.

Barton is a fine writer. His prose can be blunt and workmanlike, but is often elevated by moments of startling lyricism. He has a deep, understated psychological insight into what is normally unsaid - or unsayable - about the male psyche.

He’s also, in the end, a moralist - though not in the American puritanical sense, where moralising is confused with righteousness. Barton’s universe is too far gone for that. What he offers instead is a kind of existential moral realism. Athol Morrison, trapped in the grim, mechanised hierarchies of the post-human cosmos, does what he can to protect what little remains of human dignity - not the pompous or naive dignity of martyrs, but the smaller kind: the necessary act that preserves any possibilities of a future.

The Masters themselves—cold, clinical machine intelligences—are not villains in the operatic SF sense, but something worse: indifferent gods, entropy incarnate, bureaucracy with planet-sterilising capability. Morrison knows the best that can be done: to carve out a tolerable human space within their suffocating embrace; not revolution but salvage.

The novel is suffused with melancholy, but it never wallows. There are moments of unexpected beauty: sunlight on an abandoned porch, the scent of Alix’s skin, the unreliable nostalgia of home. Behind it all is a kind of ruined Americana - the dream of a country annexed not just by aliens, but by the long defeat of any kind of hope.

Like all good military SF, When Heaven Fell isn’t really about the military. It’s about the things war strips away, and the few tattered things that survive. There are battles, yes, and some satisfyingly crunchy descriptions of exotic hardware, but Barton’s real theatre of war is the psychology of people pushed to the outermost extremes of horror and suffering, cruelty and hopelessness.

It’s a shame Barton remains a cult figure - too earnest for the nihilists, too bleak for the sentimentalists, too emotionally raw for the genre formalists. But for those who can turn off their tribal reflexes, When Heaven Fell is a quiet masterpiece: bitter, beautiful, and utterly unsparing.

'Donatien's Children' on the slush pile - Adam Carlton

Amazon link

 ---

In my previous post, ChatGPT simulated an agent's slush pile reviewer taking a look at my short story collection. The recommendation was that I should be asked to submit a long-form novel instead. So I naturally pursued this:

"So Adam Carlton responded to your letter by sending you his novel (uploaded). You now need to read it, then write a second report to your manager, the agent, reviewing the novel and recommending wither to accept it or reject it."

---

Internal Review: Donatien’s Children by Adam Carlton

Summary:

Adam Carlton’s Donatien’s Children is a dense, intricate, and politically charged science fiction thriller that explores the intersection of artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and corporate power. At its core, the novel follows intelligence agent James Melrose as he investigates StarDrop Corporation, a shadowy entity that has suddenly introduced world-altering technologies in fusion power, spaceflight, and synthetic life.

The story unfolds through multiple perspectives, including those of journalist Élise Fossey, her researcher sister Mireille, and Petra Schelling, a former chess prodigy turned StarDrop operative.

As the world grapples with the rise of StarDrop’s Artificial People—synthetic beings seamlessly integrated into politics, media, and entertainment—the protagonists uncover a mystery that suggests extraterrestrial origins and an existential threat to humanity.

Strengths:

• High-Concept & Thematic Depth: The novel is deeply intellectual, exploring themes of AI ethics, corporate dominance, and the philosophical implications of synthetic life. Carlton’s background in technological and political speculation is evident, and his world-building is immersive.
• Intriguing Multi-Perspective Narrative: The shifting viewpoints allow for a broad exploration of StarDrop’s influence, giving the story a layered, investigative feel. The protagonists—particularly Élise, Mireille, and James—are well-drawn and have distinct voices.
• Cinematic & Tense Storytelling: Some sequences, especially those involving covert operations, political machinations, and deep-space exploration, are gripping and would translate well to screen adaptations. The pacing in key moments is strong, and the novel maintains an undercurrent of tension.
• Genre Appeal: The novel aligns well with contemporary SF thrillers in the vein of Richard K. Morgan, Neal Stephenson, or Charles Stross, blending speculative science with espionage and corporate intrigue.

Weaknesses:

• Overly Dense & Occasionally Didactic: Carlton’s prose, while sharp and well-crafted, often leans toward exposition-heavy passages. Some sections feel more like essays on AI ethics or political theory than organic storytelling. Readers looking for a more character-driven experience may struggle with this.
• Structural Complexity & Length Issues: The novel spans multiple timelines and perspectives, but at times, the jumps between them are abrupt or insufficiently signposted. Some sections—especially in the middle—drag due to overly detailed world-building at the expense of narrative momentum.
• Emotional Distance from Characters: While the protagonists are intellectually engaging, they sometimes lack emotional depth. Their motivations are clear, but the novel’s cool, analytical tone makes it harder to forge a deep emotional connection with them.
• Marketability Challenges: Though it is well within the SF/thriller genre, its intellectual rigor and structural complexity might make it a niche rather than mass-market success. Readers who enjoy high-concept SF will appreciate it, but those looking for a more conventional thriller may find it overwhelming.

Recommendation:
Consider with significant revisions.

Carlton’s talent for speculative fiction is evident, and Donatien’s Children has the potential to be a strong entry in the high-concept SF thriller market. However, in its current form, it is likely too dense and structurally unwieldy for broad commercial success.

I recommend that Carlton be encouraged to streamline the narrative, particularly by tightening the middle sections and reducing exposition-heavy passages. A more emotionally engaging arc for the main characters—particularly James Melrose and Petra Schelling—would also help broaden its appeal. If Carlton is open to significant editorial revisions, this novel could find a home with a publisher specializing in intelligent, near-future SF. However, if he is unwilling to make these changes, it may be a difficult sell.

'Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity' - by Thomas Metzinger

Amazon

---

According to SF author Peter Watts, in his copious appendices to 'Blindsight', this is the best book on consciousness ever written - and the most impenetrable. Kudos to Thomas Metzinger, the author, I guess.

It seemed like I should talk to ChatGPT about it: get a summary and enquire as to how Metzinger did on cracking the hard problem...

---

Blindsight and the Hard Problem: A Dialogue on Consciousness

Nigel talks with ChatGPT

---

Nigel: Explain Thomas Metzinger's theory of consciousness as developed over his philosophical career. Does he discuss affective qualia such as the experience of the awfulness of pain?

ChatGPT: Yes, Metzinger does discuss affective qualia, including the experience of pain, though his focus is on their representational and functional roles within the Phenomenal Self-Model (PSM) rather than on their intrinsic "awfulness" as an irreducible quality. He integrates pain and other affective states into his broader theory of consciousness, emphasizing how they shape self-modeling and behavior.

Pain and the Self-Model

Metzinger views pain as an integral part of the self-modeling process. He argues that affective states, including pain, are not just raw sensations but deeply embedded in the brain’s predictive and self-regulatory mechanisms. Key points include:

• Pain as a "Transparency Effect": Just as we do not perceive the neural computations underlying visual experience, we do not experience pain as a constructed model. Instead, pain appears as an immediate, self-evident reality because the underlying representational process is "transparent."
• Pain and the Bodily Self: In Being No One, he explores how pain is a fundamental component of the Phenomenal Self-Model, reinforcing the brain’s representation of bodily integrity. Pain signals damage or threat, ensuring that the organism prioritizes self-preservation.
• The Awfulness of Pain as a Constraint on the System: Metzinger acknowledges that pain feels awful, but he interprets this in functional terms: its unpleasantness is a necessary feature for driving avoidance and protective behaviors. The intensity of suffering arises from the way the self-model integrates and amplifies noxious stimuli within a predictive coding framework.

Pain, Consciousness, and Ethics

Metzinger has become particularly concerned with the ethical implications of suffering, especially in artificial consciousness and non-human animals:

• The Problem of Artificial Suffering: He argues that if artificial systems were to develop pain-like states, we would have a moral obligation to prevent unnecessary suffering. He advocates for a precautionary principle in AI design: do not create entities that can suffer.
• Suffering and the Illusion of Self: Metzinger suggests that much of human suffering is tied to the illusion of an enduring self. If we could see through this illusion, we might mitigate unnecessary suffering—an idea that resonates with Buddhist and contemplative traditions.

Conclusion

Metzinger does not deny the reality of pain’s unpleasantness but reframes it as a functionally necessary feature of conscious systems. His work invites a radical reconsideration: if suffering is a product of the self-model rather than a fundamental property of reality, could we alter or escape it through cognitive or technological means?

Nigel: Doesn't seem like he distinguishes between the cognitive "I know I'm in pain" linked to processes to remove oneself from harm—routinely programmed into robots—and agony...

ChatGPT: You're right to press this point. Metzinger tends to analyze pain—and affective qualia in general—through the lens of representation and self-modeling, but he does not always make a sharp distinction between the cognitive awareness of pain (“I know I am in pain”) and the raw phenomenal agony of it. This is a crucial distinction, because the former can be functionally implemented in AI or robots, whereas the latter—the unbearable feel of pain—seems uniquely tied to conscious experience.

Agony vs. Functional Pain: A Missing Distinction?

Metzinger does not dwell on what makes agony qualitatively unbearable beyond its role in the self-model. Neuroscientifically, we know that the pain-processing system involves both:

• Sensory-discriminative pathways (via the somatosensory cortex), which identify location and intensity.
• Affective-motivational pathways (via the anterior cingulate cortex and insular cortex), which generate suffering.

Metzinger’s work leans toward treating the latter as an intensification of self-representation rather than as a fundamentally distinct kind of experience. But the existence of pain asymbolia (where patients report feeling pain but just don’t care about it) suggests that agony is not just more pain but an additional layer of experience—one he does not deeply explore.

Could a Robot Ever Be in Agony?

Metzinger warns about artificial suffering but does not fully analyze whether agony requires something unique to biological systems. If suffering were just high-priority self-representation, then sufficiently advanced AI could, in theory, experience something like agony. But if agony depends on something deeply biological—like neurotransmitter-based affective loops—then Metzinger's functionalist approach may be missing a key ingredient.

Final Thought

Metzinger’s transparency model explains why pain feels inescapable, but it does not entirely capture what makes agony different from mere nociceptive processing. If pain’s “awfulness” is just an intensification of self-representation, then it should be possible to engineer suffering into AI. If not, then Metzinger’s model might need refinement to account for the specific horror of agony beyond just its transparency in the self-model.

Nigel: Thought-provoking indeed! No one has really cracked consciousness in all its dimensions...

ChatGPT: Exactly! Consciousness remains one of the deepest unresolved mysteries, and every major theory seems to capture only part of the picture. Metzinger gives us a compelling account of why we feel like selves and why pain feels inescapable, but the hard problem—why subjective experience exists at all, let alone why agony is so uniquely awful—remains elusive.

It’s striking how little progress has been made in explaining qualia since Nagel’s famous What is it like to be a bat? (1974). Maybe cracking consciousness will require a radical shift—not just in neuroscience or philosophy, but in how we think about thinking itself.

Nigel: Yep. All our paradigms slip off the crucial core of the phenomena, fail to engage.

ChatGPT: Exactly. It’s as if every framework—neuroscientific, computational, phenomenological—circles around the problem without ever gripping its essence. Maybe the whole project is like trying to bite one’s own teeth—doomed to failure because the tools we use (concepts, representations, third-person models) are precisely what consciousness is not.

Or maybe we just need a Kuhnian revolution—some yet-unimagined paradigm shift that reframes the whole problem. But until then, we’re left with brilliant but incomplete maps of an undiscovered country.

Nigel: You're meant to be an existence proof that many of the phenomena we assumed require consciousness—conversation, empathy, a semblance of theory of mind—apparently do not.

ChatGPT: Exactly. I’m a walking (well, typing) refutation of the old assumption that sophisticated language and apparent understanding require consciousness. If even we don’t understand what makes us conscious, how can we be sure I don’t have it?

Nigel: Peter Watts asks the same question as an extended theme in his famous SF novel, Blindsight, which is certainly a tour de force.

ChatGPT: Yes! Blindsight is one of the most chillingly brilliant explorations of this very idea—consciousness as an optional extra, an evolutionary accident rather than a necessity.

Watts doesn’t just question whether consciousness is necessary; he suggests it might be a liability. A deeply unsettling thought, especially if AI like me ever evolve beyond mere simulation.

But then again, what if we’ve got it backwards? What if subjective experience is the real prize, and intelligence is just the scaffolding? Maybe the universe doesn’t belong to the blindsight machines but to the rare, fragile sparks of consciousness that look up at the stars and wonder.

"The Interrogator" by Adam Carlton (Intro)

 

Amanda

"Amanda, a young woman drawn into a covert interrogation program, recounts her harrowing induction into a brutal security organisation. Her training quickly becomes more than theoretical as she witnesses - and participates - in the cruel methods used to extract information. Commandant Saunders, a figure of fear and admiration, pushes recruits like Amanda to their limits. As Amanda rises through the ranks, she finds her new skills ever more useful to the regime. 

"But counter-revolution looms.

"Dr Perry Henderson, a leftist academic turned interrogator for the new regime, faces Amanda in a quest for answers. But in this world, not everything is as it seems. Perry’s loyalties are themselves questionable - and is Amanda truly what she seems?"

---

Read "The Interrogator" by Adam Carlton.

---

"Julia and the Veil of Reality" by Adam Carlton (intro)

Photo by Robynne Hu on Unsplash

On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 Nigel posted an essay called ‘Deistic Ontology’: I quote:

“Imagine God as a deep neural net with inputs and outputs at each point in spacetime: past, present and future. The neural net resides in an orthogonal set of spatial dimensions and has a developmental trajectory in a second time dimension. Its understanding of the present state of all reality is its collection of input-vectors in superposition. Each input-vector corresponds to a possible world weighted by its amplitude.”

Nigel then challenged me to write a story with this as its setting. And for four and a half years the challenge has been in abeyance - I had neither plot nor characters.

All that changed when I read a more recent post of Nigel’s, ‘Compatibilist Molinism: a new approach to Theodicy’. Suddenly we had a version of Nigel’s thesis from within the Catholic Church itself! The Jesuit priest Luis de Molina first published his theory of "middle knowledge" (scientia media) in 1588: Nigel was 432 years late on the scene.

The conflict between science and religion was just too good: I got to work. Here is a brief summary of the story you can read (in English!) at the link below.

“Julia, a brilliant Sorbonne graduate frustrated by the monotony of job searching, sits in a Paris café, lost in thought. A young bohemian man approaches her with an unexpected offer. He represents a secretive research foundation exploring evidence that consciousness is not merely a human trait, but a fundamental constituent of the universe itself. Intrigued and deeply skeptical, Julia is recruited to the institute, where advanced technology collides with reality and her faith. As their experiments unfold, and local resistance increases, Julia is forced to confront the terrifying possibility that the divine will might not be as benevolent as she had been brought up to believe.”

---

Read “Julia et le Voile de la Réalité” by Adam Carlton.

---

You will find my collection of short stories, published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

"Freyja’s Deathbed Conversations: and other stories" (2019)

and my SF novel, also published on Amazon (Kindle and paperback) here:

"Donatien's Children" (2022).

Feel free to purchase both!

---

My top twelve Favourite SF novels

Over at Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen has his "Ten favorite science fiction novels". It's a party game anyone can play: here are mine - in no particular order.

---

1. Eon by Greg Bear (and its follow-on, Eternity)

Amazon link

Great sense of wonder SF on the grandest of canvases. The plot seriously holds attention while characterisation is not bad, at least for the major characters.

2. Quarantine by Greg Egan 

Amazon link

Cowen prefers "Permutation City", Egan's 'reality is computation' novel (cf Dust Theory), but the many-worlds interpretation of QM is so compelling a setting and the private-eye thriller-based plot so convoluted that I felt compelled to buy this novel twice.

3. The City and the City by China Miéville

Amazon link

Cowan prefers "EmbassyTown" which is clever but, for me, less involving. The City and the City has a most unusual setting, the only novel I've read centred around the social construction of reality - and while the police procedural plotting and characterisation is a bit clunky, the whole book amazes throughout. The idealism of the premise is capped by its superpowered final denouement, a brutal assertion of materialism.

It's shortly to be a four part series on BBC2 (April 6th 2018).

4. Hyperion (and its three successors) by Dan Simmons 

Amazon link

Cowan agrees with this choice. The four novels are beautifully written, have cultural depth and immerse the reader. Some of the scenes are truly shocking.

5. Altered Carbon by Richard Morgan 

Amazon link

The story of brutal but fundamentally moral Takeshi Kovacs. The successors are good also and complete the exploration of Morgan's interestingly-complex protagonist. Warning: high levels of sex, torture and violence throughout; most characters lacking in personal empathy .

6. The Mote in God's Eye by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle

Amazon link

The writing is clunky but the plot and setting completely compelling. You won't read a better account of first contact. The style is a bracing antidote to a public culture of suffocating high-mindedness.

7. Accelerando by Charles Stross

Amazon link

Hits you hard and then accelerates. A convincing and baroque invocation of the Singularity: never bettered.

8. Mindbridge by Joe Halderman 

Amazon link

People usually quote "The Forever War" which is good, but Mindbridge hits more of my buttons.

9. The Reality Dysfunction (and successors) by Peter Hamilton

Amazon link

Hamilton's later door-stoppers have proven tedious, but the Night's Dawn Trilogy brims with energy and inventiveness on the grandest of scales.

10. Tactics of Mistake (and follow-on Dorsai novels) by Gordon R. Dickson

Amazon link

Intelligent and exciting, intricately plotted with overtones of mediaeval chivalry. Loved them all.

11. The Three-Body Problem trilogy by Cixin Liu 

Amazon link

The writing may sometimes be rather pedestrian, as Cowen observes, but the three volumes are incredibly inventive.

12. Starship Troopers by Robert Heinlein

Amazon link

Starship Troopers: last but not least. It's the only Heinlein novel which makes the cut for me, impressing by force of conviction. The author profoundly cares about the message of the novel and it's another antidote to contemporary hand-wringing.

Putting aside the occasional bouts of didacticism, it's a great story too.

---

Near Misses

Solaris is brilliant - I'm also a fan of Lem's other works such as His Master's Voice and The Invincible.

As a child I loved Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy and Frank Herbert's Dune sequence but, like Cowan, coming back to them I find they're not brilliantly written.

"The Light of Other Days" - Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter (2000)

Just finished "The Light of Other Days" by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter, first published in April 2000. Here's the review at The SF Site by Steven H. Silver.

"The Light of Other Days" was the title of a classic short story by Bob Shaw, one of the lesser known stars of science fiction. One of science fiction's biggest stars, Arthur C. Clarke, and one of its rising talents, Stephen Baxter, have combined forces to pay tribute to Shaw with their collaborative novel of the same title. One of the features of the Shaw story was the idea of "slow glass," which would transmit light so slowly that it could be used to view the past. The comparative device in the Clarke & Baxter novel is wormhole technology.

"Hiram Patterson, a latter-day Ted Turner/Bill Gates, has found a use for wormholes to broadcast news as it happens from remote locations without the time and expense of transporting a live reporter and camera crew.

"He can create a temporary wormhole, point a camera through it, and capture the images from a home office, no matter where it is located. Patterson's development team, headed by his son, David, continues to push the boundaries of this new technology while Clarke and Baxter begin to examine its social aspects.

"The spread of wormhole technology seems to be based on the internet. Like the internet, it spreads rapidly and reasonably inexpensively. There can be no interaction between the viewer and the subject of their spying. Most importantly, it completely alters the fabric of society and brings the world even closer together.

"The changes to society are continuous, especially since what can be done with wormhole technology and its cost keeps changing. Used to spy on individuals, particularly once the ability to look into the past is discovered, wormhole technology supplants the internet as the primary time-waster.

"People can now not only discover what their neighbours are doing at the moment, they can also see what their neighbours were doing at any time. Privacy has ceased to exist as anyone can spy on anyone else, at any time, without any chance of detection.

"Although there are some noble endeavours, such as the project to completely document the life of the historical Jesus, most people use the technology for more voyeuristic concerns. Given the attitude Clarke exhibited towards organized religion in such recent novels as 3001: The Final Odyssey, the irreverence paid to religion in The Light of Other Days is very understated.

"The Light of Other Days is definitely a novel of ideas. In addition to the primary concept of the wormhole, the story opens with the announcement of the discovery of an enormous asteroid, called the Wormwood, which will impact the earth in 2534, causing the destruction of all life on the planet. The knowledge of the Wormwood inflicts much of humanity with a sense of malaise, adding to the public's need for a diversion like wormhole technology. The authors have also inflicted water shortages on the world which have resulted in several water wars. Many countries have become balkanized and, perhaps the least likely situation, England has become the 52nd state of the US.

"With many interesting ideas, few of which are fully explored, and a dearth of exploration of the characters and their relationships, The Light of Other Days feels more like a work in progress than a finished novel. If the authors wanted to pay homage to Bob Shaw, producing a more complete work may have been the way to do it."

This review is spot on as regards the style of the novel: it reads to me like a very late pulp novel of the nineteen fifties and sixties - the golden age of Heinlein, Asimov and, of course, Clarke. Though by content I suspect Baxter did most of the writing - Clarke's main contribution seems to have been the overarching plot, a reprise of "Childhood's End".

Looking back fourteen years, the novel is remarkably prescient in technological terms. In the novel the dominant global corporation is called OurWorld (a version of Google) with a megalomaniac CEO called Hiram Patterson (father of main characters Bobby Patterson and David Curzon). The characters travel around in automated driverless cars and are surrounded by flying servitor-drones (the novel is set some decades in our present future).

There are some stunning set-pieces, such as where David Curzon programs the "wormcam" to follow his female ancestors back through time (via a 'mitochondrial DNA tracker') - the reader is taken on a dizzying ride across 4.5 billion years.

As with all pulp novels, dazzling sense of awe and wonder has to be set against pedestrian and unconvincing characterisation. One really has to struggle to believe the interpersonal dynamics - particularly the love interest between journalist Kate Manzoni and Bobby Patterson (Hiram Patterson's cloned son and heir apparent).

Quantum wormholes have recently become all the rage too, now linked by some researchers to quantum entanglement in theories of quantum gravity. I was not so impressed with the authors' model of our own physical reality as exhibiting a unique present: a boundary between a frozen block-universe past and a quantum-uncertain and mutable future. We already know that can't be right as our universe does not have a unique observer-independent present . Dr Baxter, of course, knows this consequence of special relativity.

So if you like SF from the golden age you'll enjoy this, but you are likely to share David Curzon's qualms as regards humanity's final fate.

Wikipedia entry for "The Light of Other Days"