Wednesday, June 12, 2019

Forget Boris, it's Gove vs Hunt

Consider this scenario. Boris is one of the final two and wins the leadership election in the party-at-large on a policy of Brexit for sure (I think this means on WTO terms or something like it). Parliament doesn't agree and passes a no-confidence motion. There is an election.

A wavering-leave Tory Party is squeezed between the Brexit Party .. and the Labour and Liberal Parties, all of whom come out for Remain. They hoover up the votes of Conservative Remainers. Despite all of Boris's alleged rabble-rousing charms, the Tories are decimated: welcome to the new Lib-Lab-SNP government.

If Boris prevaricates in October, the Brexit Party continues to grow: a slow motion version of the above.

---

Boris is not the strategic thinker to get out of this hole. Logically therefore, he should not be one of the final two.

Hunt is surely the Remainers best bet. Smart, media-friendly, politically adroit.

He met with Trump - normally the mark of a supposed-winner.

Gove, once he gets past his immediate Class-A difficulties, is more Brexiteer-friendly, more ballot credible, a sop to the party-faithful. His problem is that he's too cerebral for these populist times. He doesn't look like a prime-minister: he's better cast as best-friend.

So logically, the process should return Gove-Hunt for the further party-ballot in the hope that either of them has the intellectual and political skills to navigate the very survival of the Tories where no solution currently presents itself.

Will Tory MPs see it that way, or will they panic and put Boris on the list - hope against hope that empty charisma will by some magic pull them through?

See the title of this post.

---

Note: this is an analysis of the best options for an intelligent Tory party interested in long-term survival. It does not represent my personal opinions as to who would be best PM.

None of the above would be a start.

3 comments:

  1. So as I understand this:
    (1) You are not *advocating* H versus G;
    (2) You are not *predicting* H versus G;
    (3) You are *imploring* Conservative MPs to think and vote for H versus G?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Certainly not. I'm modelling the Tory parliamentary party as a strategically-rational agent and concluding that HvG would be its optimal deliverable to ensure its own long-term survival.

      My personal views are beside the point. I am not the Tory Party! :)

      Delete
    2. Nevertheless Tory MPs are allowed to read the Blog and be influenced!

      The point being that they should be concerned about their own survival (and follow appropriate neutral advice) regardless of whether you want them to survive. I guess (3) should be:

      (3') You are *advising* that Tory survival requires H v. G.

      Anyway they now have just under a week to consider and act on this analysis.

      Delete

Comments are moderated. Keep it polite and no gratuitous links to your business website - we're not a billboard here.