Catholicism, Modernity and the Jesus Seminar
It is an under-appreciated fact for the secular majority that the orthodox, believing Catholic inhabits a world very different from theirs. For the devout, reality is numinous - a translucent existence bathed in the spiritual presence of heaven, perhaps hell, but certainly the eternal personified unity of God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. In the Catholic maximalist zeitgeist, everything has a purpose. Every person’s life is meaningful and supervised, and this earthly existence is seen as preparation for what is to come.
Adopting such an ideological position requires significant leaps of faith. One must accept the sacred texts of the Old and New Testaments more or less literally, suppressing curiosity about the historical realities of the first century CE, and the early Church during the final period of the Western Empire.
But suppose you take a different path. Suppose you examine those times and places through the contextual lenses of history, economics, politics, sociology and psychology. You would be seeking empirical knowledge about the situation of the Jewish people in antiquity, about the historical Jesus, and the institutionalisation of the church in the aftermath of his life. In this case, your sources might include the work of the Jesus Seminar and one of its most influential members, John Dominic Crossan.
John Dominic Crossan was trained as a priest and monk, but by 1969, at the age of 35, he had left both vocations. He married and joined the faculty of DePaul University, where he taught comparative religion for 26 years before retiring in 1995. Alongside Robert W. Funk, Crossan led the Jesus Seminar, a group of academics dedicated to the study of the historical Jesus during its first decade. Although Crossan continues to identify as Catholic, his modernist views raise the question: are they truly compatible with orthodox Catholicism?
Key Catholic Beliefs in the Apostles' Creed
Here are the defining beliefs of the Catholic Church, as expressed in the Apostles' Creed, in simple sentences:
- I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth.
- I believe in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord.
- Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary.
- He suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died, and was buried.
- He descended into hell, and on the third day, He rose again.
- He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
- He will come again to judge the living and the dead.
- I believe in the Holy Spirit.
- I believe in the holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints.
- I believe in the forgiveness of sins.
- I believe in the resurrection of the body.
- I believe in life everlasting.
John Dominic Crossan's Modernist Interpretation
John Dominic Crossan, a prominent biblical scholar and historian, offers a distinct interpretation of Christianity, especially through his historical-critical approach. His beliefs, based on his writings, reflect a focus on the historical Jesus, social justice, and the symbolic meaning of resurrection, rather than a literalist interpretation of traditional creeds. Here is an interpretation of Crossan’s beliefs, presented as a variation of the Apostles' Creed:
- I believe in God but understand God primarily as a metaphor for ultimate reality, not as a personal being.
- I believe in Jesus of Nazareth, a historical figure whose teachings emphasised social justice, compassion, and the Kingdom of God on earth.
- Jesus was born as a human being, with no divine conception, but his life and teachings have divine significance.
- He was crucified by Roman authorities for his political and social challenge to oppression.
- He was buried, and his resurrection is a metaphorical expression of the continuing influence of his teachings and the empowerment of his followers.
- I do not believe in a literal ascension, but that Jesus continues to inspire through his example and the community of believers.
- I believe in the coming of God's reign, but see it as a call for justice and peace in the present world, not as a future judgement.
- I believe in the Holy Spirit as the energising force within communities of justice, love, and equality.
- I believe in the community of believers, united by their commitment to the way of Jesus.
- I believe in the forgiveness of sins through the transformative power of love and social healing.
- I believe in the enduring legacy of Jesus' teachings, rather than a physical resurrection of the body.
- I believe in the possibility of eternal life, but understand it in terms of the impact we leave on the world and the love we share.
Can Crossan Be Considered an Orthodox Catholic?
Would John Dominic Crossan be accepted as an orthodox Catholic based on this comparison of beliefs? Crossan himself has stated that he avoids taking Communion in Catholic services in order to spare the presiding priest the embarrassment of refusing to give it.
Key Comparisons
1. Belief in God
Catholic: God is understood as the Father Almighty, a personal, omnipotent Creator.
Crossan: God is seen more as a metaphor for ultimate reality rather than a personal, interventionist being.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s metaphorical understanding of God differs from the Catholic belief in a personal, almighty Creator.
2. Belief in Jesus Christ
Catholic: Jesus is the Son of God, born of the Virgin Mary, fully divine and fully human.
Crossan: Jesus is seen primarily as a human figure, with divine significance attributed to his teachings rather than his nature.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s historical approach to Jesus downplays his divine nature, conflicting with Catholic dogma.
3. Belief in the Holy Spirit
Catholic: The Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, guiding the Church and believers.
Crossan: The Holy Spirit is seen more as the force within communities working for justice and love.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s social interpretation of the Holy Spirit as a communal force differs from the traditional Catholic understanding of the Holy Spirit as a divine person guiding the Church.
4. Belief in the Catholic Church
Catholic: The Catholic Church is the one true Church, with the Pope as its head, embodying the communion of saints and the sacraments.
Crossan: While Crossan believes in the community of believers, his approach to the institutional Church is less dogmatic and more focused on the broader Christian community and social justice.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s less hierarchical, more community-oriented view may conflict with the Catholic understanding of the Church as a divinely established institution.
5. Belief in the Forgiveness of Sins
Catholic: Sins are forgiven through the sacraments, particularly confession, and through God’s grace.
Crossan: Forgiveness is understood more in terms of social healing and transformation.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s view of forgiveness through social justice and healing may not fully align with the Catholic sacramental understanding of forgiveness through confession and grace.
6. Belief in the Resurrection and Eternal Life
Catholic: The resurrection of the body and life everlasting are literal beliefs, with the promise of eternal life in heaven.
Crossan: The resurrection is symbolic, representing the enduring legacy of Jesus’ teachings and the love shared in life.
Potential conflict: Crossan’s metaphorical understanding of resurrection and eternal life contrasts with the Catholic belief in a literal resurrection of the body and eternal life in heaven.
Although the two sets of beliefs overlap to a significant extent, the differences are substantial and deeply rooted in theology and metaphysics.
Crossan’s beliefs, particularly his metaphorical interpretation of God, Jesus, resurrection, and the Church, are inconsistent with core Catholic doctrines, which hold to more literal and institutionalised understandings of these concepts. While there may be some shared ethical or moral values, the theological differences are significant enough to render the two belief systems incompatible under the formal definitions used in the Apostles' Creed and Catholic doctrine.
It seems John Dominic Crossan, courageous in the search for truth, is right to be wary; and perhaps the Vatican is wrong to publicly endorse such a degree of deracinated literalism.