Esse est percipi

 ---

Our consciousness that reality - and ourselves - exist is constructed by our brains, carefully shielded and entombed within the encapsulating dome of our thick skulls. The slender evidence of reality is no more than coded pulses on afferent nerves. A mighty pyramid balanced on its point.

Does the squirrel exist when the cat has finished watching it?

And so on.

---

And here's Gemini 2.5 Pro (Experimental)...

---

Mind Over Matter? Not All Idealism is Created Equal: Berkeley vs. Hegel

(Published: March 31, 2025)

Ever pondered the nature of reality? Does the world exist independently of our minds, or is consciousness the foundation of everything? Philosophers who lean towards the latter are called idealists, believing that reality is fundamentally mental or spiritual. But even within idealism, there are vastly different flavours!

Two giants of idealist thought are George Berkeley and G.W.F. Hegel. Both argued against a purely material view of the universe, but their own visions of a mind-based reality couldn't be more distinct. Let's dive into the fascinating differences between Berkeley's Subjective Idealism and Hegel's Absolute Idealism.

Berkeley: If a Tree Falls in the Forest and No One's Around... Does it Exist?

George Berkeley (1685-1753), an Irish bishop, offered a radical and elegant solution to questions about mind and matter. His famous maxim: Esse est percipi - "To be is to be perceived."

• The Core Idea: Berkeley argued that reality is composed solely of two things: minds (or spirits) that do the perceiving, and ideas (the sensations, thoughts, and objects) that are perceived.
• No Independent Matter: That solid table you're sitting at? For Berkeley, it's not some mysterious underlying material substance. It's a collection of ideas – the sensation of hardness, the visual appearance of wood grain, its shape – existing in a mind. If no mind perceives it, it simply doesn't exist in that form.
• Where God Comes In: Berkeley wasn't suggesting your desk vanishes when you leave the room! He solved the problem of continuity and objectivity by positing an infinite, omnipresent mind: God. God perceives everything, all the time, thus holding reality in consistent existence.
• Why "Subjective"? His idealism is often called "subjective" because the existence of objects (as ideas) is dependent on a subject (a mind, whether finite like ours or infinite like God's) perceiving them.

Hegel: Reality as the Grand Unfolding Story of Spirit

Fast forward about a century to G.W.F. Hegel (1770-1831), a towering figure in German philosophy. Hegel also believed reality was fundamentally spiritual, but on a vastly grander, more complex scale.

• The Core Idea: For Hegel, reality is the dynamic, rational process of a single, all-encompassing entity called Absolute Spirit (Geist - often translated as Mind or Spirit) coming to understand itself. This isn't just a mind, but the totality of reality – including logic, nature, human consciousness, history, art, religion, and philosophy – understood as a unified, developing system.
• What About Nature and Matter? Hegel doesn't simply deny the material world like Berkeley. Instead, he sees nature as the Absolute Spirit in a state of "otherness" or externalization. It's a necessary stage in the Spirit's journey towards self-realization. The physical world is real, but its ultimate meaning and reality are found within the context of this overarching spiritual development.
• History Matters: A key element for Hegel is history. He saw human history as the progressive unfolding of Spirit's self-consciousness, driven by a dialectical process (the clash and resolution of opposing ideas – thesis, antithesis, synthesis).
• Why "Absolute"? It's "absolute" because it describes a single, total, all-inclusive reality (the Absolute Spirit) which is self-contained and not dependent on individual finite minds for its being. It aims to be the ultimate, objective account of everything.

So, What's the Big Difference? Let's Break It Down:

While both philosophers champion a mind-centric reality, they land in very different places:

1. Scope: Berkeley focuses on the relationship between individual perceivers (human and divine) and their ideas. Hegel paints on a vast canvas, describing the totality of existence (including nature and history) as a single, evolving Spirit.
2. Material World: Berkeley says poof! – no independent matter, just ideas. Hegel says matter is real but as an integral, externalized part of the Absolute Spirit's ongoing story.
3. Basis of Existence: For Berkeley, existence hinges on perception by a mind. For Hegel, existence is participation in the rational, historical unfolding of the Absolute.
4. Subjectivity vs. Absoluteness: Berkeley ties reality to subjective perception (even if God is the ultimate subject). Hegel aims for an absolute, objective account where the Spirit itself is the ultimate subject and object, encompassing all.

Final Thoughts

Comparing Berkeley and Hegel highlights the incredible diversity within idealist thought. One offers a world radically dependent on minds perceiving it, anchored by God's constant gaze. The other presents a dynamic, all-encompassing Spirit, weaving together nature, history, and consciousness into a grand, unfolding narrative of reason.

Both challenge us to reconsider the relationship between our minds and the world around us, pushing the boundaries of how we understand existence itself.

---