Temperament is both mutable and adaptive

---

Temperament and Ecology: From the Ice to the Metropolis

The Inuit, it is said, are calm, cooperative, and low in interpersonal aggression. In a fragile Arctic ecology, quarrelsome or selfish behaviour could tip the balance from survival to starvation. The group cannot afford much variance in temperament. Cooperation is enforced by necessity, and stabilising selection pushes personality into a narrow channel.

It's said that in an interview, an Inuit elder was asked what would happen to a sociopathic member of their community: "We never see anyone like that," he replied, "But I suppose if they did exist, they would probably 'slip off an ice floe'."

Selection in action.

---

Arctic Hunter-gatherers and the uniform profile

In small-scale subsistence groups under harsh conditions, the costs of conflict are high and both productivity and the gains from specialisation are low.

There are no niches for entrepreneurs, mystics, or generals. To live, people must share, restrain aggression, and align with the collective rhythm of foraging and hunting.

Studies of Big Five traits across such traditional societies show lower variance than in modern, complex states: high Agreeableness, moderate Conscientiousness, and subdued Extraversion dominate.

Deviants risk expulsion or death; homogeneity is the adaptive optimum.

---

Stratification and the rise of temperament diversity

Agriculture changes the game. Surplus generates hierarchy and a structural division of labour. States bring priests, rulers, warriors, merchants, peasants.

Each role rewards different psychological traits. Natural selection and cultural reinforcement begin to sustain multiple strategies side by side: a polymorphic ecology of personality.

• Warriors: low Agreeableness, high Extraversion, risk-seeking. Suited to violence, dominance, and command.
• Priests and bureaucrats: high Conscientiousness, low Openness. Suited to rule-following, ritual, and maintenance of order.
• Merchants: high Extraversion, moderate Openness, pragmatic Conscientiousness. Suited to negotiation and innovation.
• Peasants and artisans: high Conscientiousness, high Agreeableness. Suited to routine, diligence, and communal cohesion.
• Mystics, prophets and innovators: high Openness, variable Conscientiousness. Suited to exploration of ideas and invention - and disruptive interventions.

Unlike arctic hunter-gatherers, complex societies can absorb and exploit the tension between diverse temperaments. Personality differentiation becomes adaptive.

---

Why Keirsey’s four temperaments persist in modern nations

Keirsey’s broad types: Guardians (SJ), Artisans (SP), Idealists (NF), Rationals (NT), map neatly onto enduring niches of advanced Western societies:

• Guardians (SJ, ~40%): pillars of institutions. Their orderliness and duty sustain bureaucracies, schools, healthcare, and local communities. Adaptive because complex systems need reliable maintenance.
• Artisans (SP, ~30%): energetic, improvisational, risk-tolerant. They dominate sport, performance, entrepreneurship, the military, and manual trades where quick reactions and courage are rewarded. Adaptive because societies need doers and risk-takers.
• Idealists (NF, ~15–20%): seekers of meaning, authenticity, and moral vision. They fuel religion, activism, psychotherapy, art, and cultural innovation. Adaptive because societies need moral critique, cohesion narratives, and cultural renewal.
• Rationals (NT, ~10%): abstract, system-building, strategic. They drive science, technology, management, and statecraft. Adaptive because societies need planners, inventors, and organisers of scale. They are the intellectual force driving Total Factor Productivity.

---

The ecological logic

Advanced nations are complex ecosystems. Different niches reward different strategies; no single temperament can dominate. Guardians stabilise, Artisans energise, Idealists inspire, and Rationals engineer. 

This coexistence is not accidental but functional: a distributed division of psychological labour that allows industrial societies to sustain armies, bureaucracies, religions, markets, universities, cultural movements and technology-driven growth all at once.

---

From ice floes to empire

The Inuit case illustrates how fragile ecologies select for a uniformity of human personality. The history of states and empires shows the opposite: how surplus and stratification expand the niche space for personality, sustaining temperamental diversity.

In modern Western countries, Keirsey’s four temperaments remain adaptive because they continue to map onto roles without which the social system would collapse.