tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18648436.post1814723555199541367..comments2023-12-22T08:30:21.301+00:00Comments on Wading Through Treacle: This is what it is like ...Nigel Seelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14407392760306614271noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18648436.post-58688585935513452582016-12-31T14:43:45.796+00:002016-12-31T14:43:45.796+00:00"AI ... where the right questions could not b..."AI ... where the right questions could not be identified..." - it seems that this implies a similarity with this aspect of Theoretical Physics Research as indicated in the quoted story.<br /><br />You might want to study Fiber Bundles too, which are common in the more mathematical side of Theoretical Physics.<br /><br />Meanwhile matters related to the Penrose "non-algorithmic AI" issues provides a kind of focus of a mathematical approach to AI (or at least Cognitive Science). Thus the basic mathematical question in Cognitive Science might be "is (human) Cognition actually algorithmic?". If yes - prove it (despite Penrose); if no - find a modified structure that might work. In the latter case AI refers to the computable approximations to Cognition. Penrose sees a possible link between all this and Quantum Gravity remember - so you can have two difficult research projects for the price of one!Royhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17844610890344836500noreply@blogger.com